Cited by 34Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesPrimary Care and Health OutcomesClinical practice guidelines implementation

A bundled quality improvement program to standardize clinical blood pressure measurement in primary care

Open access
Boonyasai, Romsai T., Carson, Kathryn A., Marsteller, Jill A., Dietz, Katherine B., Noronha, Gary J., Hsu, Yea‐Jen, Flynn, Sarah J., Charleston, Jeanne M. +3 more·2018·The Journal of Clinical Hypertension

Abstract

We evaluated use of a program to improve blood pressure measurement at 6 primary care clinics over a 6‐month period. The program consisted of automated devices, clinical training, and support for systems change. Unannounced audits and electronic medical records provided evaluation data. Clinics used devices in 81.0% of encounters and used them as intended in 71.6% of encounters, but implementation fidelity varied. Intervention site systolic and diastolic blood pressure with terminal digit “0” decreased from 32.1% and 33.7% to 11.1% and 11.3%, respectively. Improvement occurred uniformly, regardless of sites’ adherence to the measurement protocol. Providers rechecked blood pressure measurements less often post‐intervention (from 23.5% to 8.1% of visits overall). Providers at sites with high protocol adherence were less likely to recheck measurements than those at low adherence sites. Comparison sites exhibited no change in terminal digit preference or repeat measurements. This study demonstrates that clinics can apply a pragmatic intervention to improve blood pressure measurement. Additional refinement may improve implementation fidelity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jch.13166

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boonyasai, R. T., Carson, K. A., Marsteller, J. A., Dietz, K. B., Noronha, G. J., Hsu, Y., Flynn, S. J., Charleston, J. M., Prokopowicz, G. P., Miller, E. R., & Cooper, L. A.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
  • Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical Research Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore MD USA
Corresponding author
Boonyasai, Romsai T.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Hypertension
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-12-21
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
324-333
ISSN
  • 1524-6175 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-7176
OpenAlex
W2776822492
Cited by
34
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
3.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (P50HL0105187, K24HL083113)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Keywords
blood pressure measurement, measurement standardization, primary care, automated blood pressure devices, terminal digit preference, implementation fidelity, protocol adherence, hypertension screening
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Blood Pressure, Blood Pressure Determination, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Primary Health Care, Sphygmomanometers, Guideline Adherence, Quality Improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review