Cited by 35Mesenchymal stem cell researchBone Metabolism and DiseasesBone health and osteoporosis research

Bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs CD45 ‐ /CD44 + /CD73 + /CD90 + ) isolated from osteoporotic mice SAM/P6 as a novel model for osteoporosis investigation

Open access
Sikora, Mateusz, Śmieszek, Agnieszka, Marycz, Krzysztof·2021·Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine

Abstract

Abstract Available therapies aimed at treating age‐related osteoporosis are still insufficient. Therefore, designing reliable in vitro model for the analysis of molecular mechanisms underlying senile osteoporosis is highly required. We have isolated and characterized progenitor cells isolated from bone marrow (BMSCs) of osteoporotic mice strain SAM/P6 (BMSC SAM/P6 ). The cytophysiology of BMSC SAM/P6 was for the first time compared with BMSCs isolated from healthy BALB/c mice (BMSC BALB/c ). Characterization of the cells included evaluation of their multipotency, morphology and determination of specific phenotype. Viability of BMSCs cultures was determined in reference to apoptosis profile, metabolic activity, oxidative stress, mitochondrial membrane potential and caspase activation. Additionally, expression of relevant biomarkers was determined with RT‐qPCR. Obtained results indicated that BMSC SAM/P6 and BMSC BALB/c show the typical phenotype of mesenchymal stromal cells (CD44+, CD73+, CD90+) and do not express CD45. Further, BMSC SAM/P6 were characterized by deteriorated multipotency, decreased metabolic activity and increased apoptosis occurrence, accompanied by elevated oxidative stress and mitochondria depolarisation. The transcriptome analyses showed that BMSC SAM/P6 are distinguished by lowered expression of molecules crucial for proper osteogenesis, including Coll‐1 , Opg and Opn . However, the expression of Trap , DANCR1 and miR‐124‐3p was significantly up‐regulated. Obtained results show that BMSC SAM/P6 present features of progenitor cells with disturbed metabolism and could serve as appropriate model for in vitro investigation of age‐dependent osteoporosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jcmm.16667

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • BMSCs were identified by flow cytometry using CD44 and CD90 as positive markers and CD34 and CD45 as negative markers in accordance with ISCT criteria, and their tri-lineage differentiation potential was confirmed.

    “The cell purity was assessed based on the expression levels of CD44 (BioLegend, USA) and CD90 (BioLegend, USA) as positive markers, and CD34 (BioLegend, USA) and CD45 (BioLegend, USA) as negative markers, in accordance with the criteria established by the International Society for Cellular Therapy (ISCT) [45].”

    From Hydrogel scaffold encapsulating MSC-Exos and ZIF-8 promotes bone regeneration via coordinating osteogenesis and immunomodulation (2025) · cites this paper as [45]

    The Results (Characterization of isolated BMSCs; page unavailable) report CD44 and CD90 expression, lack of CD45 expression, and differentiation under chondrogenic, osteogenic, and adipogenic conditions. The Introduction lists CD34 negativity among ISCT criteria, but the paper does not report testing its cells for CD34. The Methods describe immunocytochemical staining and confocal microscopy, not flow cytometry, for the measured markers. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [1]Porter JL, Varacallo M. Osteoporosis. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; 2020. Accessed January 2, 2021. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK441901/

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sikora, M., Śmieszek, A., & Marycz, K.
Affiliations
Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences (PL)
Corresponding author
Marycz, Krzysztof
Venue
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-06-01
Volume
25
Issue
14
Pages
6634-6651
ISSN
  • 1582-1838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1582-4934
OpenAlex
W3165711336
Cited by
35
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
FWCI
3.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Narodowe Centrum Nauki (UMO 2017/26/M/NZ5/01184)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Mesenchymal stem cell research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bone Metabolism and Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
Keywords
mesenchymal stem cells, senile osteoporosis, apoptosis, oxidative stress, mitochondrial depolarization, cellular metabolism, bone formation, miR-124-3p, traps, osteoprotegerin, osteopontin, type I collagen
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Differentiation, Humans, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Osteoblasts, Osteogenesis, Osteoporosis, Stem Cells, 5'-Nucleotidase, Leukocyte Common Antigens, Thy-1 Antigens, Hyaluronan Receptors, Mice, Mesenchymal Stem Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review