The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Logic of Political Coverage on Twitter: Temporal Dynamics and Content
Abstract
Social media services have become areas of political communication. Politicians integrate them in their campaigns, journalists use them as sources and topics, and the public uses them for the discussion of politics. In this, political activities on social media are clearly interconnected with the coverage of politics by traditional media. This article analyzes Twitter messages commenting on politics during the campaign for the 2009 federal election in Germany. It will be shown that the temporal dynamics and content of Twitter messages follow a hybrid logic of political coverage, sometimes following the same logic as the coverage of political actors in traditional news media, whereas in other cases following a logic specific to political expression on the Internet.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Index of Factorial Simplicity
Kaiser, H. F. (1974) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02291575 · Cited by 14,898
ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis
Wickham, H. (2009) · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-98141-3 · Cited by 14,447
The application of electronic computers to factor analysis
Kaiser, H. F. (1960) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316446002000116 · Cited by 12,459
What is Twitter, a social network or a news media?
Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., & Moon, S. (2010) · Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web · doi:10.1145/1772690.1772751 · Cited by 6,652
Affective News and Networked Publics: The Rhythms of News Storytelling on #Egypt
Papacharissi, Z., & de Fatima Oliveira, M. (2012) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01630.x · Cited by 803
Information and American Democracy: Technology in the Evolution of Political Power
Bimber, B. (2003) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511615573 · Cited by 526
Collective Action in Organizations: Interaction and Engagement in an Era of Technological Change
Bimber, B., Flanagin, A., & Stohl, C. (2012) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511978777 · Cited by 339
Cited by
Social Media and Political Agenda Setting
Gilardi, F., Gessler, T., Kubli, M., & Müller, S. (2022) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2021.1910390 · Cited by 401
Conway, B. A., Kenski, K., & Wang, D. (2015) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/jcc4.12124 · Cited by 395
Seizing the moment: The presidential campaigns’ use of Twitter during the 2012 electoral cycle
Kreiss, D. (2016) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444814562445 · Cited by 331
Dual Screening the Political: Media Events, Social Media, and Citizen Engagement
Vaccari, C., Chadwick, A., & O'Loughlin, B. (2015) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/jcom.12187 · Cited by 288
Liu, X. (2020) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.02.021 · Cited by 140
Metadata
- Authors
- Jungherr, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Communication
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-03-19
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 239-259
- ISSN
- 0021-9916 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1901581540
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 64.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
