The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Seizing the moment: The presidential campaigns’ use of Twitter during the 2012 electoral cycle
Abstract
Drawing on interviews with staffers from the 2012 Obama and Romney presidential campaigns and qualitative content analysis of their Twitter feeds, this article provides the first inside look at how staffers used the platform to influence the agendas and frames of professional journalists, as well as appeal to strong supporters. These campaigns sought to influence journalists in direct and indirect ways, and planned their strategic communication efforts around political events such as debates well in advance. Despite these similarities, staffers cite that Obama’s campaign had much greater ability to respond in real time to unfolding commentary around political events given an organizational structure that provided digital staffers with a high degree of autonomy. After analyzing the ways staffers discuss effective communication on the platform, this article argues that at extraordinary moments campaigns can exercise what Isaac Reed calls “performative power,” influence over other actors’ definitions of the situation and their consequent actions through well-timed, resonant, and rhetorically effective communicative action and interaction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data
Langley, A. (1999) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1999.2553248 · Cited by 7,008
boyd, D., & Crawford, K. (2012) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2012.678878 · Cited by 5,479
Learning from Strangers: The Art and Method of Qualitative Interview Studies
Adler, P. A., Adler, P., & Weiss, R. S. (1995) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2076552 · Cited by 3,586
The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power
Chadwick, A. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199759477.001.0001 · Cited by 1,550
The hybrid media system: politics and power
(2014) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.51-6974 · Cited by 841
The Emergence of Organizations and Markets
Padgett, J. F., & Powell, W. W. (2012) · doi:10.23943/princeton/9780691148670.001.0001 · Cited by 745
How culture works: Perspectives from media studies on the efficacy of symbols
Schudson, M. (1989) · Theory and Society · doi:10.1007/bf00160753 · Cited by 476
The MoveOn Effect: The Unexpected Transformation of American Political Advocacy
Karpf, D. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199898367.001.0001 · Cited by 359
More Tweets, More Votes: Social Media as a Quantitative Indicator of Political Behavior
DiGrazia, J., McKelvey, K., Bollen, J., & Rojas, F. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0079449 · Cited by 341
The agenda-building function of political tweets
Parmelee, J. H. (2014) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444813487955 · Cited by 303
Cited by
Bossetta, M. (2018) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1077699018763307 · Cited by 689
Curated Flows: A Framework for Mapping Media Exposure in the Digital Age
Thorson, K., & Wells, C. (2016) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1111/comt.12087 · Cited by 570
Frenemies: How Social Media Polarizes America
Settle, J. E. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781108560573 · Cited by 377
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · doi:10.1017/9781108923323 · Cited by 175
Guerrero-Solé, F. (2018) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305118808776 · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- Kreiss, D.
- Venue
- New Media & Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-07-09
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1473-1490
- ISSN
- 1461-4448 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7315
- OpenAlex
- W2151907069
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 64.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Seizing the moment: The presidential campaigns’ use of Twitter during the 2012 electoral cycle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1461444814562445
- The paper
- Kreiss, D. (2016). Seizing the moment: The presidential campaigns’ use of Twitter during the 2012 electoral cycle. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814562445
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.