Cited by 38Oral microbiology and periodontitis researchDental Health and Care UtilizationPeriodontal Regeneration and Treatments

Three‐year randomized study of manual and power toothbrush effects on pre‐existing gingival recession

Open access
Dörfer, Christof E., Staehle, Hans Jörg, Wolff, Diana·2016·Journal of Clinical Periodontology

Abstract

Aim: To compare long‐term effects of brushing with an oscillating–rotating power toothbrush or an ADA reference manual toothbrush on pre‐existing gingival recession. Materials and Methods: In this controlled, prospective, single‐blind, parallel‐group study, healthy subjects with pre‐existing recession were randomized and brushed with a power toothbrush (n = 55) or an ADA reference manual toothbrush (n = 54) for a 3‐year study period. Subjects were required to brush their teeth twice daily for 2 min. using a standard fluoride toothpaste. During the study, subjects were assessed for clinical attachment loss and probing pocket depths to the nearest mm at six sites per tooth by the same calibrated examiner. Gingival recession was calculated at pre‐existing sites as the difference between clinical attachment loss and probing pocket depths. Hard and soft oral tissues were examined to assess safety. Results: After 35 ± 2 months, mean gingival recession did not differ significantly between groups, but was significantly reduced from baseline (p < 0.001), from 2.35 ± 0.35 mm to 1.90 ± 0.58 mm in the power and from 2.26 ± 0.31 mm to 1.81 ± 0.66 mm in the manual group. Conclusions: Gingival recession in subjects with pre‐existing recession was significantly reduced after 3 years of brushing with either a power or manual toothbrush.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jcpe.12518

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In patients with pre-existing gingival recessions, there are no differences between manual and power toothbrush groups in further recession when evaluated for 1-3 years.

    “Even in patients with pre-existing gingival recessions, which are more susceptible to the development of further recessions, there were no differences between manual and power toothbrush groups when evaluated for 1-3 years.108,109”
  • In two long-term studies, a substantial amount of recessions showed a reduction after 1-3 years without any additional therapy.

    “In two long-term studies, it was found that a substantial amount of recessions showed a reduction after 1-3 years without any additional therapy.108,109”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hirschfeld, I. (1931) Toothbrush trauma recession. A clinical study. Journal of Dental Research 11, 61– 63.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dörfer, C. E., Staehle, H. J., & Wolff, D.
Affiliations
  • Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE)
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
Corresponding author
Dörfer, Christof E.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Periodontology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-05-05
Volume
43
Issue
6
Pages
512-519
ISSN
  • 0303-6979 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-051X
OpenAlex
W2257255036
Cited by
38
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
FWCI
5.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal Of Clinical Periodontology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Procter & Gamble
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
Keywords
gingival recession, power toothbrush, oscillating-rotating toothbrush, manual toothbrush, toothbrushing technique, clinical attachment loss, probing depth
MeSH terms
Dental Plaque, Dental Plaque Index, Equipment Design, Gingival Recession, Gingivitis, Humans, Prospective Studies, Toothbrushing, Single-Blind Method

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review