CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 182Oral microbiology and periodontitis researchDental Health and Care UtilizationOral Health Pathology and Treatment

The efficacy of manual toothbrushes following a brushing exercise: a systematic review

Slot, DE, Wiggelinkhuizen, L, Rosema, NAM, Van der Weijden, GA·2012·International Journal of Dental Hygiene
DOI 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2012.00557.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

To cite this article: Int J Dent Hygiene10, 2012; 187–197 DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2012.00546.x Slot DE, Wiggelinkhuizen L, Rosema NAM, Van der Weijden GA. The efficacy of manual toothbrushes following a brushing exercise: a systematic review. Abstract: Aim: To determine the efficacy of manual tooth brushing with respect to toothbrush design and brushing duration. Material and Methods: The PubMed–MEDLINE and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched through October 2010 to identify appropriate studies. The outcome measurement was dental plaque removal following subject brushing. Results: The search yielded 2119 titles and abstracts. Ultimately, 59 papers with 212 brushing exercises as separate legs of the experiments and meeting the eligibility criteria were selected. Overall, a brushing exercise provides a 42% (21) plaque score reduction (95% CI: 41.23; 42.03). Of the brushing studies providing data as assessed according to the Quigley and Hein plaque index, the weighted mean reduction from baseline in plaque scores was 30% (95% CI: 26.79; 33.21). A weighted mean plaque score reduction of 53% (95% CI: 49.51; 56.49) was observed in the experiments using the Navy plaque index. Subanalysis between the different bristle tuft configurations illustrated variation in plaque removal ability (24–61%). The angled bristle design numerically showed the highest mean plaque reduction with either index. A subanalysis of brushing duration revealed after 1 min, a mean reduction of 27% and after 2 min, 41%. Conclusion: The efficacy in plaque removal following a brushing exercise is a reduction from baseline plaque scores of 42% on average, with a variation of 30–53% dependent on the plaque index used. The available evidence indicates that bristle tuft arrangement (flat trim, multilevel, angled) and brushing duration are factors that contribute to the variation in observed efficacy. [Correction added on 5 July 2012, after first online publication: In Table 1a, the overall effect of a brushing exercise was estimated at 50% (33) plaque score reduction (95% CI: 46.54; 55.40). This was corrected to 42% (21) plaque score reduction (95% CI 41.23; 42.03) in the abstract and throughout the manuscript] Table 1. Summary of the efficacy following brushing exercises ordered by plaque index and presented as a weighted mean percentage reduction in plaque index scores (standard deviations of the weighted mean in parentheses) (a) Total Plaque index No. of studies No. of experiments No. of participants WM (SD) 95% CI* Q&H (12–14) 32 121 5478 30% (18) 26.79; 33.21 Navy (15, 16) 29 91 5328 53% (17) 49.51; 56.49 S&L (17) NA NA NA NA NA Overall effect 59 212 10806 42% (21) 41.23; 42.03 (b) Subanalysis of brush head design Plaque index Bristle tuft configuration No. of studies No. of experiments No. of participants WM (SD) 95% CI* Q&H (12–14) Flat trim 23 74 3464 24% (11) 21.49; 26.51 Multilevel 10 23 1020 33% (19) 25.23; 40.77 Angled 7 11 599 39% (22) 26.00; 52.00 Navy (15, 16) Flat trim 16 27 1764 47% (12) 42.47; 51.53 Multilevel 19 33 2050 54% (15) 48.88; 59.12 Angled 11 26 1489 61% (20) 53.31; 68.69 (c) Subanalysis of brushing duration Plaque index Minutes No. of studies No. of experiments No. of participants WM (SD) 95% CI* Q&H (12–14) 1 20 83 4039 27% (17) 25.78; 26.80 2 6 11 349 41% (13) 39.45; 42.26 NA, not applicable; WM, weighted mean; SD, standard deviation; Q&H, Quigley and Hein plaque index 1962 (12), Turesky modification of the Quigley and Hein plaque index 1970 (13), Lobene modification of the Quigley and Hein plaque index 1982 (14); Navy, Navy plaque index 1972 (15), Rustogi modified Navy plaque index 1992 (16); S&L, Silness and Löe plaque index 1964 (17); CI, confidence interval. *As a measure of precision, the standard error of the weighted mean (which is a reflection of the variation among studies) was used relative to the number of experiments available to calculate the lower and upper limits of the 95% confidence interval of the weighted mean difference.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2012.00557.x

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Slot, D., Wiggelinkhuizen, L., Rosema, N., & Van der Weijden, G.
Affiliations
University of Applied Sciences Utrecht (NL)
ORCID
Rosema, NAM
Venue
International Journal of Dental Hygiene
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-06-06
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
187-197
ISSN
  • 1601-5029 (ISSN-L)
  • 1601-5037
DOI
10.1111/j.1601-5037.2012.00557.x
OpenAlex
W3209004141
Cited by
182
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
  • International Journal of Dental Hygiene (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral Health Pathology and Treatment
Keywords
manual toothbrush, toothbrush design, brushing duration, dental plaque removal, oral hygiene, gingivitis, periodontitis
MeSH terms
Dental Devices, Home Care, Dental Plaque, Dental Plaque Index, Humans, Oral Hygiene, Patient Education as Topic, Toothbrushing, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review