Cited by 168Language Development and DisordersReading and Literacy DevelopmentDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Language profiles and literacy outcomes of children with resolving, emerging, or persisting language impairments

Open access
Snowling, Margaret J., Duff, Fiona J., Nash, Hannah M., Hulme, Charles·2016·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Children with language impairment ( LI ) show heterogeneity in development. We tracked children from pre‐school to middle childhood to characterize three developmental trajectories: resolving, persisting and emerging LI . Methods: We analyzed data from children identified as having preschool LI , or being at family risk of dyslexia, together with typically developing controls at three time points: t1 (age 3;09), t3 (5;08) and t5 (8;01). Language measures are reported at t1, t3 and t5, and literacy abilities at t3 and t5. A research diagnosis of LI (irrespective of recruitment group) was validated at t1 by a composite language score derived from measures of receptive and expressive grammar and vocabulary; a score falling 1 SD below the mean of the typical language group on comparable measures at t3 and t5 was used to determine whether a child had LI at later time points and then to classify LI s as resolving, persisting or emerging. Results: Persisting preschool LI s were more severe and pervasive than resolving LI s. Language and literacy outcomes were relatively poor for those with persisting LI , and relatively good for those with resolving LI . A significant proportion of children with average language abilities in preschool had LI s that emerged in middle childhood – a high proportion of these children were at family risk of dyslexia. There were more boys in the persisting and resolving LI groups. Children with early LI s which resolved by the start of formal literacy instruction tended to have good literacy outcomes; children with late‐emerging difficulties that persisted developed reading difficulties. Conclusions: Children with late‐emerging LI are relatively common and are hard to detect in the preschool years. Our findings show that children whose LI s persist to the point of formal literacy instruction frequently experience reading difficulties.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jcpp.12497

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Snowling, M. J., Duff, F. J., Nash, H. M., & Hulme, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Snowling, Margaret J.
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-12-17
Volume
57
Issue
12
Pages
1360-1369
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
OpenAlex
W2213327213
Cited by
168
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
24.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (WT082036AIA)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
language impairment, developmental trajectories, literacy outcomes, reading difficulties, preschool children, middle childhood, language assessment, sex differences
MeSH terms
Literacy, Child, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Language Disorders, Male

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review