Cited by 33Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

Forming first impressions of children: the role of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms and emotion dysregulation

Lee, Christine A., Milich, Richard, Lorch, Elizabeth P., Flory, Kate, Owens, Julie Sarno, Lamont, Andrea E., Evans, Steven W.·2018·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Previous research on peer status of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has focused on already-established peer groups, rendering the specific social behaviors that influence peers' initial impressions largely unknown. Recently, theorists have argued that emotion dysregulation is a key aspect of ADHD, with empirical work finding relations between emotion dysregulation and social outcomes. Therefore, the current study focuses on the initial interactions among children varying in ADHD symptoms duringh a novel playgroup, proposing that emotion dysregulation displayed during the playgroup may serve as a possible pathway between ADHD symptoms and peers' initial negative impressions. Methods Participants were 233 elementary-age children ranging from 8 to 10 years old (M = 8.83, 70% male). Parents and teachers rated children's ADHD symptoms and related impairment; 51% of the children met criteria for an ADHD diagnosis. Then, children participated with unfamiliar peers in a three-hour playgroup that included three structured and two unstructured tasks. After the tasks, children and staff rated each child on social outcomes. Coders unaware of child's diagnostic status watched videos of the groups and rated each child's global emotion dysregulation during each task. Results Using multiple raters and methods, ADHD severity was associated with more negative peer ratings, through observed emotion dysregulation. Results were consistent for both parent a…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jcpp.12835

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, C. A., Milich, R., Lorch, E. P., Flory, K., Owens, J. S., Lamont, A. E., & Evans, S. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Kentucky (US)
  • University of South Carolina (US)
  • Ohio University (US)
Corresponding author
Lee, Christine A.
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-10-30
Volume
59
Issue
5
Pages
556-564
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
OpenAlex
W2766924690
Cited by
33
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
FWCI
2.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Institute of Education Sciences
  • U.S. Department of Education (R324A120003)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, emotional dysregulation, peer likeability, peer status, elementary school students, social behavior, ADHD symptoms
MeSH terms
Affective Symptoms, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Peer Group, Social Desirability, Social Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review