Cited by 29Child Abuse and TraumaChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentChild Welfare and Adoption

Triangulating evidence on the role of perceived versus objective experiences of childhood adversity in psychopathology

Open access
Baldwin, Jessie R., Degli Esposti, Michelle·2021·JCPP Advances

Abstract

Childhood adversities, such as maltreatment, bullying, and socioeconomic deprivation, are well-established risk factors for psychopathology. Recent evidence suggests that it is the perceived, rather than objective (i.e., actual) experience of childhood adversity which is associated with psychopathology (Danese & Widom, 2020). However, it is unclear whether perceptions of childhood adversity cause psychopathology, as this cannot be tested ethically or feasibly with randomised controlled trials. Triangulation can instead be used to improve causal inference in observational research, by integrating evidence across multiple approaches with different sources of bias.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jcv2.12010

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mental health problems predict poor outcomes in major life domains, such as occupational attainment, physical health, and mortality.

    “given that mental health problems predict poor outcomes in major life domains, such as occupational attainment (59), physical health (60), and mortality (61).”

    From Childhood Maltreatment and Mental Health Problems: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Quasi-Experimental Studies (2023) · cites this paper as [59]

    Citation (59) is attached to occupational attainment. The Measurement Comparisons section discusses childhood adversity as a predictor of psychopathology, not whether mental health problems predict occupational attainment. Searches for “occupational attainment” and related work outcomes found no passage addressing that relationship; the copy provides no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baldwin, J. R., & Degli Esposti, M.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Department of Social Policy and Intervention University of Oxford Oxford UK
Corresponding author
Baldwin, Jessie R.
Venue
JCPP Advances
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-04
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
e12010-e12010
ISSN
2692-9384 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3158787889
Cited by
29
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2
FWCI
4.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JCPP Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome (215917/Z/19/Z)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
Keywords
childhood adversity, psychopathology, maltreatment, bullying, socioeconomic deprivation, causal inference, triangulation, risk factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review