Cited by 283Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentChild Abuse and TraumaFamily Dynamics and Relationships

Longitudinal links between spanking and children’s externalizing behaviors in a national sample of White, Black, Hispanic, and Asian American families

Open access
Gershoff, Elizabeth T, Lansford, Jennifer E, Sexton, Holly R, Davis-Kean, Pamela, Sameroff, Arnold J·2012·Child Development

Abstract

This study examined whether the longitudinal links between mothers’ use of spanking and children’s externalizing behaviors are moderated by family race/ethnicity, as would be predicted by cultural normativeness theory, once mean differences in frequency of use are controlled. A nationally representative sample of White, Black, Hispanic, and Asian American families (n = 11,044) was used to test a cross-lagged path model from 5 to 8 years old. While race/ethnic differences were observed in the frequency of spanking, no differences were found in the associations of spanking and externalizing over time: Early spanking predicted increases in children’s externalizing while early child externalizing elicited more spanking over time across all race/ethnic groups.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01732.x

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Compromised parenting behaviors are associated with increased risk for negative social, emotional, and behavioral outcomes among children.

    “these other forms of compromised parenting are also associated with increased risk for negative social, emotional, and behavioral outcomes among children”

    From Intergenerational effects of childhood maltreatment: A systematic review of the parenting practices of adult survivors of childhood abuse, neglect, and violence. (2020) · cites this paper as Gershoff et al., 2012

    The Discussion (page not supplied) reports that early spanking was associated with increased externalizing behavior across the racial and ethnic groups studied. That supports the behavioral-outcomes part of the claim, but the paper does not establish the broader claim about other compromised parenting behaviors or social and emotional outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Cross-lagged studies have demonstrated that spanking predicts changes in children's behavior over and above initial levels and the child effect of early problem behavior on later spanking.

    “A series of cross-lagged studies (Berlin et al., 2009; Gershoff, Lansford, Sexton, Davis-Kean, & Sameroff, 2012; McLeod, Kruttschnitt, & Dornfeld, 1994; Sheehan & Watson, 2008) has demonstrated that spanking predicts changes in children’s behavior, over and above their initial levels and the child effect of early problem behavior on later spanking.”

    From Spanking and child outcomes: Old controversies and new meta-analyses. (2016) · cites this paper as Gershoff et al., 2012

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [17]17. Muthe ´n, L. K., & Muthe ´n, B. O. (2010). Mplus user's guide (6th ed.) Los Angeles: Muthe ´n & Muthe ´n.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gershoff, E. T., Lansford, J. E., Sexton, H. R., Davis-Kean, P., & Sameroff, A. J.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Gershoff, Elizabeth T
Venue
Child Development
Published
2012-05-01
Volume
83
Issue
3
Pages
838-843
ISSN
  • 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8624
OpenAlex
W1826111286
Cited by
283
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 5
FWCI
21.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0818478)
  • University of Michigan
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD042144, P2CHD042849)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
Keywords
spanking, corporal punishment, externalizing problems, children, race and ethnicity, maternal discipline, cross-cultural comparison, early childhood
MeSH terms
Asian, Child, Child Behavior, Child Rearing, Educational Status, Employment, Family Characteristics, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Parents, Punishment, Marital Status, Black People, White People, Racial Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review