Cited by 58Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesCutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management

Identification of responders to immune checkpoint therapy: Which biomarkers have the highest value?

Open access
Liebl, M.C., Hofmann, T.G.·2019·Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology

Abstract

Evasion of immune recognition by the innate and acquired immune system is a major principle of tumour cells and belongs to the hallmarks of cancer. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-based cancer therapies targeting the co-inhibitory receptors CTLA-4 or PD-1 have received enormous scientific and clinical attention during the last few years, because of promising clinical results observed in the treatment of different cancer entities including melanoma and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. However, the enthusiasm about the effects of the immune checkpoint inhibitors is muted as only a subfraction of patients shows a stable clinical response. To predefine the patient cohorts that may benefit from immune checkpoint therapy, rigorous biomarker analyses, which predict the response to these novel therapies, need to be performed. In addition, combination of immune checkpoint therapy with classical DNA-damaging chemotherapy or radiotherapy, which positively affects tumour neo-antigen presentation, appears to be a promising approach in optimizing patients' response. In this review, we briefly summarize important biomarkers for patient stratification and discuss the current limitations of these biomarkers in defining responders vs. non-responders to immune checkpoint therapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jdv.15992

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pembrolizumab has been approved by the FDA for the treatment of a variety of tumour types based on observed robust objective responses and an excellent pharmacokinetic and safety profile.

    “Pembrolizumab has been approved by the FDA for the treatment of a variety of tumour types based on the observed robust objective responses and an excellent pharmacokinetic and safety profile [5].”

    From Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Cancer Therapy (2022) · cites this paper as [5]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Schadendorf D, Fisher DE, Garbe C et al. Melanoma. Nat Rev Dis Prim 2015; 1: 15003.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liebl, M. C., & Hofmann, T. G.
Affiliations
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
Corresponding author
Hofmann, T.G.
Venue
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-12
Volume
33
Issue
S8
Pages
52-56
ISSN
  • 0926-9959 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3083
OpenAlex
W2996712113
Cited by
58
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Gutenberg Open Science (submittedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • Gutenberg Open Science
Funders
Sonderforschungsbereich (SFB 1361)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Keywords
immune checkpoint inhibitors, predictive biomarkers, CTLA-4, PD-1, melanoma, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, treatment response prediction, patient stratification, combination therapy with chemotherapy and radiotherapy, tumor immune evasion
MeSH terms
Humans, Immunotherapy, Neoplasms, Biomarkers, Tumor, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review