Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 363

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Updated S2K guidelines on the management of pemphigus vulgaris and foliaceus initiated by the european academy of dermatology and venereology (EADV)

Open access
Joly, P., Horvath, B., Patsatsi, Α, Uzun, S., Bech, R., Beissert, S., Bergman, R., Bernard, P., Borradori, L., Caproni, M., Caux, F., Cianchini, G., Daneshpazhooh, M., De, D, Dmochowski, M., Drenovska, K., Ehrchen, J., Feliciani, C., Goebeler, M., Groves, R., Guenther, C., Hofmann, S., Ioannides, D., Kowalewski, C., Ludwig, R., Lim, Y.L., Marinovic, B., Marzano, A.V., Mascaró, J.M., Mimouni, D., Murrell, D.F., Pincelli, C., Squarcioni, C.P., Sárdy, M., Setterfield, J., Sprecher, E., Vassileva, S., Wozniak, K., Yayli, S., Zambruno, G., Zillikens, D., Hertl, M., Schmidt, E.·2020·Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology

Abstract

Background: Pemphigus encompasses a group of life‐threatening autoimmune bullous diseases characterized by blisters and erosions of the mucous membranes and skin. Before the era of immunosuppressive treatment, pemphigus was almost always fatal. Due to its rarity, only few randomized controlled therapeutic trials are available. Recently, rituximab has been approved as first‐line treatment for moderate and severe pemphigus vulgaris in Europe and the United States. Objectives: The Autoimmune blistering diseases Task Force of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) has initiated a throughout update of the guideline for the management of patients with pemphigus. Results: The guidelines for the management of pemphigus were updated, and the degree of consent among all task force members was included. The final version of the guideline was consented by the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) and several patient organizations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jdv.16752

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 363

Metadata

Authors
Joly, P., Horvath, B., Patsatsi, Α., Uzun, S., Bech, R., Beissert, S., Bergman, R., Bernard, P., Borradori, L., Caproni, M., Caux, F., Cianchini, G., Daneshpazhooh, M., De, D., Dmochowski, M., Drenovska, K., Ehrchen, J., Feliciani, C., Goebeler, M., Groves, R., Guenther, C., Hofmann, S., Ioannides, D., Kowalewski, C., Ludwig, R., Lim, Y. L., Marinovic, B., Marzano, A. V., Mascaró, J. M., Mimouni, D., Murrell, D. F., Pincelli, C., Squarcioni, C. P., Sárdy, M., Setterfield, J., Sprecher, E., Vassileva, S., Wozniak, K., Yayli, S., Zambruno, G., Zillikens, D., Hertl, M., & Schmidt, E.
Venue
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-08-24
Volume
34
Issue
9
Pages
1900-1913
ISSN
  • 0926-9959 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3083
OpenAlex
W3080818382
Cited by
363
References
17
FWCI
23.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.