Cited by 9Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPediatric Pain Management Techniques

Support for the Spanish version of the CPAQ-8 as a measure of chronic pain acceptance

Sánchez‐Rodríguez, Elisabet, de la Vega, Rocío, Racine, Mélanie, Roy, Rubén, Jensen, Mark P., Miró, Jordi·2019·Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

Abstract

Aim and objective: To provide evidence regarding the psychometric properties of the Spanish eight‐item version of the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ‐8). Method: Three hundred adults with chronic pain completed measures of pain acceptance, committed action, fear of movement, anxiety, depression, and health‐related quality of life. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of the CPAQ‐8 was performed. Reliability and validity were also evaluated. Results: The CFA confirmed a two‐factor structure. The CPAQ‐8 Total and subscale scores showed acceptable‐to‐good internal consistency. Furthermore, the Total and the Activity Engagement scale scores showed moderate associations with Committed Action scores, supporting construct validity. Both the Total and the two subscale scores showed good criterion validity. Conclusion: The findings provide further support for the reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the CPAQ‐8 Total and subscale scores.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jep.13092

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sánchez‐Rodríguez, E., de la Vega, R., Racine, M., Roy, R., Jensen, M. P., & Miró, J.
Affiliations
  • Institut de Recerca Biomèdica Catalunya Sud (ES)
  • Department of Rehabilitation Medicine University of Washington Seattle Washington USA
  • Western University (CA)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Miró, Jordi
Venue
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-12-27
Volume
25
Issue
5
Pages
881-888
ISSN
  • 1356-1294 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2753
OpenAlex
W2908207671
Cited by
9
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Fundación Grünenthal España
  • Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats
  • Universitat Rovira i Virgili
  • European Regional Development Fund
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Keywords
Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire, chronic pain, pain acceptance, Spanish translation, psychometric properties, factor structure, reliability statistics, construct validity, criterion validity, committed action, kinesiophobia, health-related quality of life
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain Measurement, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Spain, Translations, Reproducibility of Results, Pain Perception, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review