Cited by 101Coffee research and impactsFood Chemistry and Fat AnalysisFermentation and Sensory Analysis

Differentiation of volatile profiles and odor activity values of Turkish coffee and French press coffee

Open access
Amanpour, Armin, Selli, Serkan·2016·Journal of Food Processing and Preservation

Abstract

Abstract Volatile compositions of coffee obtained from two different coffee brewing methods, T urkish coffee ( TC ) and F rench press coffee ( FPC ), were analyzed by the gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry technique. Liquid–liquid extraction with dichloromethane was used for extraction of volatile compounds. A total of 60 and 58 volatile compounds comprising furans, lactones, phenolic compounds, pyridines, pyrazines, acids, cyclopentenes, pyrroles, furanones, ketones, alcohols, aldehydes and thiols were identified and quantified in TC and FPC , respectively. Among the detected compounds, furans were present in the highest levels, followed by lactones. Furfuryl alcohol followed by ɣ‐butyrolactone, pyridine, hexadecanoic acid, maltol, 2‐methyl pyrazine and furfuryl acetate were found in large amounts in both coffee brews. It was observed that the volatile profiles of both samples were quite similar. Based on the odor activity values ( OAVs ), 13 volatile compounds presented OAVs greater than 1 and guaiacol, 2,3‐butanedione and furfuryl acetate were the highest OAVs in both coffee samples. Practical Applications Coffee is one of the most widely consumed beverages in the world. The results of this first study provide valuable information for understanding the aroma and odor activity value differences between Turkish coffee and French press coffee. The liquid–liquid extraction technique for isolation followed by analysis and identification of those compounds by gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry is an effective practical application tool for volatile description in coffee samples. It was observed that the volatile profiles of both samples were quite similar.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jfpp.12692

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. BLANK, I., SEN, A. and GROSCH, W. 1991. Aroma impact compounds of Arabica and Robusta coffee. Qualitative and quantitative investigations. In Proceedings of the 14th ASIC Colloquium, San Francisco, pp. 117-129, ASIC, Paris, France.
  2. FLAMENT, I. 2002. The individual constituents: structure, nomenclature, origin, chemical and organoleptic properties. In Coffee Flavour Chemistry (I. Flament, ed.) Wiley, Chichester, U.K. FLAMENT, I. and BESSIERE-THOMAS, Y. 2002. Coffee Flavour Chemistry, Wiley, New York, NY.
  3. GROSCH, W. 2001. Volatile compounds. In Coffee: Recent Developments (R.J. Clarke and O.H. Vitzthum, eds.) pp. 68-89, Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Oxford.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Amanpour, A., & Selli, S.
Affiliations
Cukurova University (TR)
Corresponding author
Selli, Serkan
Venue
Journal of Food Processing and Preservation
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-12-15
Volume
40
Issue
5
Pages
1116-1124
ISSN
0145-8892 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2219724073
Cited by
101
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Food Processing and Preservation (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Chemistry and Fat Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
Keywords
Turkish coffee, odor activity value, coffee aroma, brewing technology, furan, lactones, furfuryl alcohol, 2-methylpyrazine, guaiacol, diacetyl, furfuryl acetate, phenolic compounds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review