Cited by 30Plasma Applications and DiagnosticsMicrobial Inactivation MethodsPostharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management

Influence of cold plasma voltage and time on quality attributes of tender coconut water ( Cocos nucifera L.) and degradation kinetics of its blended beverage

Chutia, Hemanta, Mahanta, Charu Lata·2021·Journal of Food Processing and Preservation

Abstract

In this study, the influence of cold plasma treatment on quality parameters of tender coconut water (TCW) and its beverage and the kinetics of degradation were investigated. In TCW, the kinetics of ascorbic acid, antioxidant activity, and transmittance followed the zero-order model whereas TA, total fatty acid (TFA) content, and microbial load followed first-order reaction. TCW stored well for 2 days at 6°C. Process parameters for nonthermal cold plasma treatment were optimized by response surface methodology (RSM) as well as hybrid artificial neural network (ANN)/genetic algorithm (GA) for maximum DPPH scavenging activity and minimum peroxidase activity. Treated TCW stored at 6°C in a glass bottle was microbiologically acceptable till 8 days, whereas treated TCW that was blended with orange juice and ascorbic acid showed a shelf life of 35 and 18 days on storage at 6°C and 27°C, respectively. Degradation kinetics of the quality parameters of cold plasma treated blended beverage were similar to untreated TCW. Novelty impact statement The application of cold plasma to food materials is a novel nonthermal way of extending the shelf life of food. Optimized conditions of cold plasma treatment were predicted with the minimum error of prediction to obtain longer shelf life and microbiologically safe tender coconut water (TCW)-based beverage with minimal degradation of bioactive compounds. Also, the kinetics parameters related to quality that were studied will help in designing the process parameters of a robust cold plasma unit. The effect of hurdles like orange juice and ascorbic acid will help to understand their synergistic effect along with cold plasma on the quality parameters of TCW for the improved storage period. Degradation kinetics of the treated beverage at accelerated temperature will help to determine the shelf life at various storage temperatures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jfpp.15372

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chutia, H., & Mahanta, C. L.
Affiliations
Tezpur University (IN)
Corresponding author
Mahanta, Charu Lata
Venue
Journal of Food Processing and Preservation
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-02-26
Volume
45
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 0145-8892 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-4549
OpenAlex
W3131625436
Cited by
30
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Food Processing and Preservation (publishedVersion)
Funders
All India Council for Technical Education (Student ID: 1‐3139726178)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Plasma Applications and Diagnostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Microbial Inactivation Methods
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
Keywords
cold plasma treatment, tender coconut water, Cocos nucifera, shelf life extension, degradation kinetics, vitamin C, antioxidant activity, peroxidase activity, microbial load, storage temperature, non-thermal food processing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review