Cited by 33Public Health and Social InequalitiesHealth disparities and outcomesGender, Health, and Social Inequality

How families matter for health inequality during the COVID‐19 pandemic

Open access
Thomeer, Mieke Beth, Yahirun, Jenjira, Colón‐López, Alejandra·2020·Journal of Family Theory & Review

Abstract

We theorize that the social conditions surrounding the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic have the potential to increase the importance of families for health and widen existing inequalities. We suggest three primary tenets important for understanding families and health during COVID‐19. First, risks of specific COVID‐19 outcomes and other health problems are unevenly distributed across families. Second, how families impact health during the COVID‐19 pandemic is conditional on public policies, organizational decisions, and concurrent events. Third, many health inequalities driven by racism, sexism, classism, and other oppressive societal forces are amplified during COVID‐19, but the extent to which this is occurring is shaped by families and by the public policies, organizational decisions, and concurrent events that also impact families and health. As health disparities continue to emerge from this pandemic, we call on researchers and policymakers to pay attention to the multiple ways that families matter.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jftr.12398

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • COVID-19 has widened gaps among married people, single people, those living with others, and those living in isolation.

    “COVID-19 has widened gaps among married people, single people, those living with others, and those living in isolation [10].”

    From Depression, anxiety, and stress in Korean general population during the COVID-19 pandemic. (2022) · cites this paper as [10]

    The Conclusion says the fallout from COVID-19 “suggests that we are headed for widening gaps” between married and single people and between those living with others and those in isolation. The claim presents those projected gaps as already widened, which is stronger than the source’s qualified statement. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 70 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Fine GA, & Abramson CM (2020). Ethnography in the time of Covid-19. Vectors and the vulnerable. Etnografia e ricerca qualitativa, 13(2), 165– 174.
  2. Prickett KC, Fletcher M, & Chapple S (2020, 7, 3). The parenting myth revealed by lockdown. https://www.newsroom.co.nz/ideasroom/the-parenting-myth-revealed-by-lockdown

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thomeer, M. B., Yahirun, J., & Colón‐López, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • Bowling Green State University (US)
Corresponding author
Thomeer, Mieke Beth
Venue
Journal of Family Theory & Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-12
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
448-463
ISSN
  • 1756-2570 (ISSN-L)
  • 1756-2589
OpenAlex
W3114398694
Cited by
33
References
70
Citations by year
2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7
FWCI
2.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Family Theory & Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG069251)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P2CHD050959, R24HD050959)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, health disparities, family, racism, sexism, classism, public policy, organizational decision-making, family health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review