Cited by 112Gastrointestinal motility and disordersGut microbiota and healthInfant Health and Development

Controversies and reality of the FODMAP diet for patients with irritable bowel syndrome

Open access
Halmos, Emma P, Gibson, Peter R·2019·Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Abstract

Since its first trial showing evidence of efficacy for managing symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome, the fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols (FODMAP) diet has been gaining popularity but not without criticism. Application of the diet has changed from a rigid list of “allowed” and “not allowed” foods to a structured program of initial FODMAP restriction followed by food reintroduction and finally personalization so that patients are empowered to adjust their diet themselves to achieve good predictability of symptoms. Safety concerns of the diet have centered around its initial elimination leading to compromise of nutritional and psychological health, but careful patient assessment and management, preferably through a FODMAP‐trained dietitian, will reduce the risk of such negative health outcomes. Most negative attention for the FODMAP diet has been the notion that it will ruin the microbiota. Controlled studies have indicated that reducing FODMAP intake has no effects on bacterial diversity but will reduce total bacterial abundance, and higher FODMAP intakes will increase health‐promoting bacteria, supporting the concept of the full FODMAP program, including attaining a minimal “maintenance” level of FODMAP restriction. This review addresses all these concerns in detail and how to overcome them, including the use of a “FODMAP‐gentle” diet, describing restriction of a select few foods very concentrated in FODMAPs. This version of the diet is commonly applied in practice by experienced FODMAP‐trained dietitians but is not clearly described in literature. Careful direction and assessment of response or nonresponse will decrease the risks of over‐restriction and under‐restriction of diet.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jgh.14650

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Caan B, Ballard-Barbash R, Slattery ML et al. Low energy reporting may increase in intervention participants enrolled in dietary intervention trials. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2004; 104: 537-66.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Halmos, E. P., & Gibson, P. R.
Affiliations
The Alfred Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Halmos, Emma P
Venue
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-04-04
Volume
34
Issue
7
Pages
1134-1142
ISSN
  • 0815-9319 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1746
OpenAlex
W2920947995
Cited by
112
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 4
FWCI
2.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Infant Health and Development
Keywords
FODMAP diet, irritable bowel syndrome, food reintroduction, personalized nutrition, gut microbiota, bacterial diversity, nutritional safety, mental health, dietary restriction
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Bacteria, Dietary Carbohydrates, Digestion, Fermentation, Humans, Nutritional Status, Nutritive Value, Risk Factors, Treatment Outcome, Patient Selection, Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Diet, Carbohydrate-Restricted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review