The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Chronic Wound Repair and Healing in Older Adults: Current Status and Future Research
Open accessAbstract
Older adults are more likely to have chronic wounds than younger people, and the effect of chronic wounds on quality of life is particularly profound in this population. Wound healing slows with age, but the basic biology underlying chronic wounds and the influence of age‐associated changes on wound healing are poorly understood. Most studies have used in vitro approaches and various animal models, but observed changes translate poorly to human healing conditions. The effect of age and accompanying multimorbidity on the effectiveness of existing and emerging treatment approaches for chronic wounds is also unknown, and older adults tend to be excluded from randomized clinical trials. Poorly defined outcomes and variables; lack of standardization in data collection; and variations in the definition, measurement, and treatment of wounds also hamper clinical studies. The Association of Specialty Professors, in conjunction with the National Institute on Aging and the Wound Healing Society, held a workshop, summarized in this article, to explore the current state of knowledge and research challenges, engage investigators across disciplines, and identify research questions to guide future study of age‐associated changes in chronic wound healing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gurtner, G. C., Werner, S., Barrandon, Y., & Longaker, M. T. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07039 · Cited by 6,542
Sindrilaru, A., Peters, T., Wieschalka, S., Baican, C., Baican, A., Peter, H., Hainzl, A., Schatz, S., Qi, Y., Schlecht, A., et al. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci44490 · Cited by 1,100
The pig as a model for human wound healing
Sullivan, T. P., Eaglstein, W. H., Davis, S. C., & Mertz, P. (2001) · Wound Repair and Regeneration · doi:10.1046/j.1524-475x.2001.00066.x · Cited by 1,091
Mechanisms of hair graying: incomplete melanocyte stem cell maintenance in the niche
Nishimura, E. K., Granter, S. R., & Fisher, D. E. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1099593 · Cited by 750
Macrophage Dysfunction Impairs Resolution of Inflammation in the Wounds of Diabetic Mice
Khanna, S., Biswas, S., Shang, Y., Collard, E., Azad, A., Kauh, C., Bhasker, V., Gordillo, G. M., Sen, C. K., & Roy, S. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009539 · Cited by 694
Guest Editorial: are diabetes‐related wounds and amputations worse than cancer?
Armstrong, D. G., Wrobel, J., & Robbins, J. M. (2007) · International Wound Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1742-481x.2007.00392.x · Cited by 456
Age-Related Alterations in the Inflammatory Response to Dermal Injury
Swift, M. E., Burns, A. L., Gray, K. L., & DiPietro, L. A. (2001) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1046/j.0022-202x.2001.01539.x · Cited by 398
Self-citationLanting, L. C., Joung, I. M. A., Mackenbach, J. P., Lamberts, S. W. J., & Bootsma, A. H. (2005) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.28.9.2280 · Cited by 386
The Neuropathic Diabetic Foot Ulcer Microbiome Is Associated With Clinical Factors
Gardner, S. E., Hillis, S. L., Heilmann, K., Segre, J. A., & Grice, E. A. (2013) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/db12-0771 · Cited by 320
Self-citationAshcroft, G. S., Mills, S. J., & Ashworth, J. J. (2002) · Biogerontology · doi:10.1023/a:1021399228395 · Cited by 309
Cited by
Human Wounds and Its Burden: An Updated Compendium of Estimates
Sen, C. K. (2019) · Advances in Wound Care · doi:10.1089/wound.2019.0946 · Cited by 1,123
Falanga, V., Isseroff, R. R., Soulika, A. M., Romanelli, M., Margolis, D., Kapp, S., Granick, M., & Harding, K. (2022) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/s41572-022-00377-3 · Cited by 1,020
Self-citationHuman Wound and Its Burden: Updated 2020 Compendium of Estimates
Sen, C. K. (2021) · Advances in Wound Care · doi:10.1089/wound.2021.0026 · Cited by 1,017
Jaul, E., & Barron, J. (2017) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2017.00335 · Cited by 946
The humanistic and economic burden of chronic wounds: a protocol for a systematic review
Järbrink, K., Ni, G., Sönnergren, H., Schmidtchen, A., Pang, C., Bajpai, R., & Car, J. (2017) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-016-0400-8 · Cited by 538
Metadata
- Authors
- Gould, L., Abadir, P., Brem, H., Carter, M., Conner‐Kerr, T., Davidson, J., DiPietro, L., Falanga, V., Fife, C., Gardner, S., Grice, E., Harmon, J., Hazzard, W. R., High, K. P., Houghton, P., Jacobson, N., Kirsner, R. S., Kovacs, E. J., Margolis, D., McFarland Horne, F., Reed, M. J., Sullivan, D. H., Thom, S., Tomic‐Canic, M., Walston, J., Whitney, J. A., Williams, J., Zieman, S., & Schmader, K.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-03
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 427-438
- ISSN
- 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-5415
- OpenAlex
- W2021886526
- Cited by
- 378
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 22.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chronic Wound Repair and Healing in Older Adults: Current Status and Future Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/jgs.13332
- The paper
- Gould, L., Abadir, P., Brem, H., Carter, M., Conner‐Kerr, T., Davidson, J., DiPietro, L., Falanga, V., Fife, C., Gardner, S., Grice, E., Harmon, J., Hazzard, W. R., High, K. P., Houghton, P., Jacobson, N., Kirsner, R. S., Kovacs, E. J., Margolis, D., . . . Schmader, K. (2015). Chronic Wound Repair and Healing in Older Adults: Current Status and Future Research. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.13332
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
