Cited by 59Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes

The effect of a comprehensive dementia care management program on end-of-life care

Open access
Jennings, Lee A., Turner, Maurice, Keebler, Chandra, Burton, Carl H., Romero, Tahmineh, Wenger, Neil S., Reuben, David B.·2019·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Although Alzheimer disease and other dementias are life limiting, only a minority of these patients or their proxy decision makers participate in advance care planning. We describe end‐of‐life care preferences and acute care and hospice use in the last 6 months of life for persons enrolled in a comprehensive dementia care management program. DESIGN: Observational, retrospective cohort. SETTING: Urban, academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 322 persons enrolled in dementia care management after July 1, 2012, who died before July 1, 2016. INTERVENTION: Dementia care comanagement model using nurse practitioners partnered with primary care providers and community organizations to provide comprehensive dementia care, including advance care planning. MEASUREMENTS: Advance care preferences, use of Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST), hospice enrollment, and hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits in the last 6 months of life obtained from electronic health record data. RESULTS: Nearly all decedents (99.7%, N = 321) had a goals‐of‐care conversation documented (median = 3 conversations; interquartile range = 2‐4 conversations), and 64% had advance care preferences recorded. Among those with recorded preferences, 88% indicated do not resuscitate, 48% limited medical interventions, and 35% chose comfort‐focused care. Most patients (89%) specified limited artificial nutrition, including withholding feeding tubes. Over half (54%) had no hospitalizations or ED visits in the last 6 months of life, and intensive care unit stays were rare (5% of decedents). Overall, 69% died on hospice. Decedents who had completed a POLST were more likely to die in hospice care (74% vs 62%; P = .03) and die at home (70% vs 59%; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Enrollees in a comprehensive dementia care comanagement program had high engagement in advance care planning, high rates of hospice use, and low acute care utilization near the end of life. Wider implementation of such programs may improve end‐of‐life care for persons with dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:443–448, 2019.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jgs.15769

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Structured, complex, multifaceted interventions in the context of advance care planning and shared decision making may effectively prevent disproportionate/unwanted end-of-life care and accordingly reduce use of healthcare resources.

    “Structured, complex, multifaceted interventions in the context of advance care planning and shared decision making may effectively prevent disproportionate/unwanted end-of-life care and accordingly reduce use of healthcare resources. 4,7,44,72,355,398”

    From European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Ethics of resuscitation and end of life decisions (2021) · cites this paper as [44]

    The Discussion (page not available in our copy) reports high engagement in advance care planning and low acute-care use among program enrollees, and suggests the program may help prevent readmissions or recurrent emergency visits. It does not establish that the intervention prevented unwanted care or reduced resource use: the authors explicitly describe the study as noncausal and limited to one dementia-care program. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The use of structured communication tools may help improve communication with families, as suggested by two systematic reviews.

    “The use of structured communication tools may help to improve communication with families, as suggested by two systematic reviews. 37,44”

    From European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Ethics of resuscitation and end of life decisions (2021) · cites this paper as [44]

    The Introduction and Discussion say that tools have been developed to promote shared end-of-life decision-making, including for people with dementia and their family caregivers. The References identify two systematic reviews on such tools. Jennings et al. is itself a descriptive study, however, and does not report that structured tools improved communication with families. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Two RCTs and four observational studies included in another systematic review did not report any significant association between communication tools for end-of-life decision making and DNACPR status.

    “In contrast, two RCTs and four observational studies included in another systematic review did not report any significant association between communication tools for end-of-life decision making and DNACPR status. 44”

    From European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Ethics of resuscitation and end of life decisions (2021) · cites this paper as [44]

    The Results report DNR preferences among participants in a dementia care program, not findings from two RCTs and four observational studies. The Introduction and References mention a systematic review of communication tools, but our copy does not report whether those tools were significantly associated with DNACPR status. Searches for the study counts and association found no such passage; page numbers were unavailable. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Evidence from five systematic reviews suggests that advance care planning may improve patient/family satisfaction with care.

    “Evidence from five systematic reviews suggests that advance care planning may improve patient/family satisfaction with care. 9,31,37,38,44”

    From European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Ethics of resuscitation and end of life decisions (2021) · cites this paper as [44]

    The Discussion describes this paper as a descriptive study of one dementia care program, not a systematic review. Its Results report advance care planning and end-of-life care measures, but no patient or family satisfaction outcome. Searches for satisfaction and systematic reviews found no passage supporting the attributed finding. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Although a meta-analysis of three observational studies suggested that communication tools are associated with reduced ICU length of stay of non-survivors, this was not confirmed in one RCT.

    “In addition, although a meta-analysis of three observational studies suggested that communication tools are associated with reduced ICU length of stay of non-survivors, this was not confirmed in one RCT. 44”

    From European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Ethics of resuscitation and end of life decisions (2021) · cites this paper as [44]

    The Methods and Results describe ICU stays among decedents in a dementia care program, not ICU length of stay in a meta-analysis or RCT. The Discussion mentions communication tools but does not report the claimed comparison (searched: three observational studies, non-survivors, ICU length of stay, RCT). (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jennings, L. A., Turner, M., Keebler, C., Burton, C. H., Romero, T., Wenger, N. S., & Reuben, D. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
Corresponding author
Reuben, David B.
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-01-24
Volume
67
Issue
3
Pages
443-448
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W2914371054
Cited by
59
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3
FWCI
7.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Alzheimer's Association (New Investigator Research Grant 15‐364406)
  • Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (HHSM 500‐2011‐00002I Task Order HHSM‐500‐T0009)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UCLA CTSI UL1TR000124)
  • National Institute on Aging (Medical Student Training in Aging Research T35AG02)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Keywords
dementia care management, end-of-life care, advance care planning, hospice use, POLST, goals of care discussions, do-not-resuscitate orders, emergency department visits, nurse practitioners, Alzheimer's disease
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, California, Decision Making, Dementia, Female, Humans, Male, Patient Care Planning, Retrospective Studies, Terminal Care, Hospice Care, Advance Care Planning, Electronic Health Records, Quality Improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review