Cited by 53Healthcare Policy and ManagementDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes

Recommendations to Improve Payment Policies for Comprehensive Dementia Care

Open access
Lees Haggerty, Kristin, Epstein‐Lubow, Gary, Spragens, Lynn H., Stoeckle, Rebecca J., Evertson, Leslie C., Jennings, Lee A., Reuben, David B.·2020·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

Access to comprehensive dementia care is limited. Recent changes in billing for professional services, including new physician fee schedule codes, encourage clinicians to provide new services; however, current reimbursement does not cover costs for all needed elements of dementia care. The Payment Model for Comprehensive Dementia Care Conference convened more than 50 national experts from diverse perspectives to review promising strategies for payment reform including ways to accelerate their adoption. Recommendations for reform included payments for services to family caregivers; new research to determine success metrics; education for consumers, providers, and policymakers; and advancing a population health model approach to tier coverage based on risk and need within a health system.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jgs.16807

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These collaborative and comprehensive models have been associated with a range of benefits including reduced behavioral symptoms, improved function and quality of life, decreased caregiver burden, and lower health care costs related to hospitalizations, emergency department visits and other outpatient visits.

    “These collaborative and comprehensive models have been associated with a range of benefits including reduced behavioral symptoms, improved function and quality of life, decreased caregiver burden, and lower health care costs related to hospitalizations, emergency department visits and other outpatient visits.”

    From 2024 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures (2024) · cites this paper as [754]

    The Background (page unavailable) reports reduced behavioral symptoms and caregiver burden, improved quality of life, reduced emergency-department use, and lower total Medicare costs for particular comprehensive dementia-care models. It does not report improved function or attribute lower costs specifically to hospitalizations, emergency-department visits, and other outpatient visits; low hospitalization rates and ED use are reported separately from costs. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lees Haggerty, K., Epstein‐Lubow, G., Spragens, L. H., Stoeckle, R. J., Evertson, L. C., Jennings, L. A., & Reuben, D. B.
Affiliations
  • Education Development Center, Inc Waltham Massachusetts
  • Alpert Medical School of Brown University Providence Rhode Island
  • Spragens and Associates (United States) (US)
  • Education Development Center (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-09-25
Volume
68
Issue
11
Pages
2478-2485
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W3087992667
Cited by
53
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2
FWCI
5.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
John A. Hartford Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Keywords
dementia care, payment reform, reimbursement, family caregivers, payment for services, health care access
MeSH terms
Comprehensive Health Care, Congresses as Topic, Dementia, Fee Schedules, Medicare, Humans, Medicaid, Reimbursement Mechanisms, United States, Caregivers, Health Care Reform, Delivery of Health Care, Integrated

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review