Cited by 119Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesPain Management and Opioid Use

Hospice Use and Outcomes in Nursing Home Residents with Advanced Dementia

Open access
Kiely, Dan K., Givens, Jane L., Shaffer, Michele L., Teno, Joan M., Mitchell, Susan L.·2010·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify characteristics of nursing home (NH) residents with advanced dementia and their healthcare proxies (HCPs) associated with hospice referral and to examine the association between hospice use and the treatment of pain and dyspnea and unmet needs during the last 7 days of life. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Twenty‐two Boston‐area NHs. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred twenty‐three NH residents with advanced dementia and their HCPs. MEASUREMENTS: Data were collected at baseline and quarterly for up to 18 months. Hospice referral, frequency of pain and dyspnea, and treatment of these symptoms was ascertained. HCPs reported unmet needs during the last 7 days of the residents' lives for communication, information, emotional support, and help with personal care. RESULTS: Twenty‐two percent of residents were referred to hospice. After multivariable adjustment, factors associated with hospice referral were nonwhite race, eating problems, HCP's perception that the resident's had less than 6 months to live, and better HCP mental health. Residents in hospice were more likely to receive scheduled opioids for pain (adjusted odds ratio (AOR)=3.16; 95% confidence interval (95% CI)=1.57–6.36) and oxygen, morphine, scopolamine, or hyoscyamine for dyspnea (AOR=3.28, 95% CI=1.37–7.86). HCPs of residents in hospice reported fewer unmet needs in all domains during the last 7 days of the residents' life. CONCLUSION: A minority of NH residents with advanced dementia received hospice care. Hospice recipients were more likely to received scheduled opioids for pain and symptomatic treatment for dyspnea and had fewer unmet needs at the end of life.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03185.x

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Medicare beneficiaries with advanced dementia enrolled in hospice are more likely to receive regular treatment for pain.

    “and more likely to receive regular treatment for pain.778”

    From 2023 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures (2023) · cites this paper as [778]

    The Results section reports that nursing-home residents with advanced dementia on hospice were more likely to receive scheduled opioids for pain than those not on hospice (48.3% versus 19.4%). That supports the point about regular pain treatment, but the study population was nursing-home residents; it does not establish the finding for Medicare beneficiaries with advanced dementia generally. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Those enrolled in hospice care are more likely to receive regular treatment for pain.

    “and more likely to receive regular treatment for pain. 936”

    From 2024 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures (2024) · cites this paper as [936]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [12]NHPCO Facts and Figures: Hospice Care in American 2009 Edition: http://www.nhpco.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=5994 January 15, 2010

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kiely, D. K., Givens, J. L., Shaffer, M. L., Teno, J. M., & Mitchell, S. L.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-12
Volume
58
Issue
12
Pages
2284-2291
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W1926099231
Cited by
119
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 10
FWCI
5.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG024091, K24AG033640)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
hospice care, advanced dementia, nursing home residents, health care proxy, hospice referral, pain management, palliative care, racial disparities, end-of-life care
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Analgesics, Opioid, Boston, Dementia, Dyspnea, Female, Homes for the Aged, Humans, Male, Nursing Homes, Pain, Prospective Studies, Referral and Consultation, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Geriatric Assessment, Confidence Intervals, Odds Ratio, Treatment Outcome, Hospice Care, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review