Cited by 25Body Composition Measurement TechniquesNutrition and Health in AgingBone health and osteoporosis research

Assessment of regional adipose tissue depots: a DXA and CT comparison in cadavers of elderly persons

Scafoglieri, Aldo, Deklerck, Rudi, Tresignie, Jonathan, De Mey, Johan, Clarys, Jan Pieter, Bautmans, Ivan·2013·Experimental Gerontology

Abstract

Objective Since dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) cannot distinguish between different adipose tissue (AT) deposits, it remains unclear how DXA-derived body composition variables relate to anatomical tissue (sub)compartments. The aim of the present study was to compare and relate regional DXA variables with absolute tissue masses obtained by computer tomography (CT) scanning of the lower limbs in elderly persons.Methods Eleven well-preserved white Caucasian adults (seven male and four female cadavers) with a median age of 79.0 years (ranging from 68 to 96 years) were fully scanned with DXA and CT. Separate densities of skin tissue, AT, muscle tissue and bone were obtained by hydrostatic weighing.Results The leg DXA-variables were significantly related (rho-values between 0.60 and 0.98, P < 0.01) to CT-derived tissue counterparts, but showed significant systematic differences except for subcutaneous AT mass (P = 0.773). After controlling for other AT depots, fat as measured by DXA (fat(DXA)) related only to intermuscular AT (rho = 0.82, P < 0.01) in males and to subcutaneous AT (rho = 0.84, P < 0.05) in females.Conclusion Although significantly interrelated, DXA and CT variables should not be used interchangeably since they have different quantitative and physiological significance. Our results suggest that fat(DXA) represents different parts of AT depots in elderly men and women. Since DXA is not appropriate for assessing tissue variability cautious clinical interpretation is warranted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.exger.2013.07.005

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Scafoglieri, A., Deklerck, R., Tresignie, J., De Mey, J., Clarys, J. P., & Bautmans, I.
Affiliations
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
Corresponding author
Scafoglieri, Aldo
Venue
Experimental Gerontology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-09
Volume
48
Issue
9
Pages
985-991
ISSN
0531-5565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2039884201
Cited by
25
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5
FWCI
1.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental Gerontology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (OZR1402BOF, OZR2095BOF)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
Keywords
dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, computed tomography, body composition, intermuscular fat, subcutaneous adipose tissue, lower extremity, older adults, corpses, sex differences, method comparison
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Anthropometry, Body Composition, Cadaver, Female, Humans, Leg, Male, Sex Characteristics, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Reproducibility of Results, Absorptiometry, Photon, Subcutaneous Fat

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review