Cited by 177Nutrition and Health in AgingClinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyDietetics, Nutrition, and Education

Prevalence of hospital-acquired malnutrition and modifiable determinants of nutritional deterioration during inpatient admissions: a systematic review of the evidence

Open access
Cass, Alyssa R., Charlton, Karen E.·2022·Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics

Abstract

Background: Malnutrition affects between 20% and 50% of hospital inpatients on admission, with further declines expected during hospitalisation. This review summarises the existing literature on hospital‐acquired malnutrition that examines the magnitude of nutritional deterioration amongst adult inpatients and identifies preventable barriers to optimising nutrition support during episodes of care. Methods: A systematic review was conducted to answer the question: Among adult hospital inpatients, the presence of which modifiable factors contribute to hospital‐acquired malnutrition? A database search was conducted between the 24 April and 30 June 2020 using CINAHL, MEDLINE, Scopus and PubMed databases according to a protocol registered with PROSPERO (CD42020182728). In addition, issues of the 10 top clinical nutrition journals published during the period of from 1 April 2015 to 30 March 2020 were hand‐searched. Results: Fifteen articles were eligible for inclusion from a total of 5944 retrieved abstracts. A narrative synthesis of evidence was completed because of the high level of heterogeneity in methodologies. Nutritional deterioration is common among previously well‐nourished and nutritionally compromised patients, with studies reporting that 10%–65% of patients experienced nutritional decline. Frequently reported barriers were mealtime interruptions, meal dissatisfaction, procedure‐related fasting, effects of illness or treatment, chewing difficulties, poor appetite and malnutrition as a low clinical priority. Conclusions: The findings of this review support the need for routine nutritional risk screening throughout each hospital admission with hospital‐acquired malnutrition affecting up to 65% of inpatients. Clear establishment of the roles and responsibilities of each member within multidisciplinary healthcare teams in the provision of nutrition care and cost–benefit analyses are recommended to demonstrate the effectiveness of changes to models of care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jhn.13009

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Malnutrition prevalence among hospitalized patients is estimated to range from 20% to 60%.

    “Malnutrition prevalence estimates range from 20% to 60% for hospitalized patients.”

    From Malnutrition and Cachexia in Inpatients With Acute Cardiac Conditions: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2026) · cites this paper as [8]

    The Introduction states that malnutrition affects 20%–50% of hospital inpatients, supporting the lower bound but not the claimed 60% upper bound. The Results report rates up to 65% for nutritional deterioration during admission, which is a different measure from malnutrition prevalence. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The 20%-60% malnutrition prevalence estimates for hospitalized patients are probably underestimates because of limitations in documentation, coding, and diagnostic criteria.

    “The malnutrition prevalence estimates ranging from 20% to 60% for hospitalized patients are probably underestimates resulting from limitations in documentation, coding, and diagnostic criteria.8”

    From Malnutrition and Cachexia in Inpatients With Acute Cardiac Conditions: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2026) · cites this paper as [8]

    The Introduction (page not provided) gives a 20%–50% prevalence range for hospital inpatients, not 20%–60%. The Discussion (page not provided) says assessment and reporting methods may underestimate hospital-acquired malnutrition, but it does not attribute underestimation of the stated inpatient prevalence range to documentation and coding limitations. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

7 of the 69 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [20]Kyriakos G, Calleja‐Fernández A, Ávila‐Turcios D, Cano‐Rodríguez I, Ballesteros Pomar MD, Vidal‐Casariego A. Prolonged fasting with fluid therapy is related to poorer outcomes in medical patients. Nutr Hosp. 2013; 28: 1710– 6. 24160237
  2. [43]White JV, Guenter P, Jensen G, Malone A, Schofield M. Consensus statement Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition: characteristics recommended for the identification and documentation of adult malnutrition (undernutrition). J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2012; 36: 275– 83. 22535923
  3. [61]McClave SA, Taylor BE, Martindale RG, Warren MM, Johnson DR, Braunschweig C, et al. Guidelines for the provision and assessment of nutrition support therapy in the adult critically ill patient. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2016; 40: 159– 211. 26773077
  4. [65]Eide HD, Halvorsen K, Almendingen K. Barriers to nutritional care for the undernourished hospitalised older people. J Clin Nurs. 2015; 24: 696– 706. 24646060 PMC4359674

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cass, A. R., & Charlton, K. E.
Affiliations
University of Wollongong (AU)
Corresponding author
Charlton, Karen E.
Venue
Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-04-26
Volume
35
Issue
6
Pages
1043-1058
ISSN
  • 0952-3871 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-277X
OpenAlex
W4224979341
Cited by
177
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 70 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 8
FWCI
4.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Wollongong
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education
Keywords
hospital-acquired malnutrition, nutritional deterioration, inpatient nutrition, nutritional risk screening, modifiable risk factors, chewing difficulty, appetite loss
MeSH terms
Adult, Hospitalization, Hospitals, Humans, Inpatients, Nutritional Status, Nutrition Assessment, Prevalence, Malnutrition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review