Cited by 1,284Clinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyNutrition and Health in AgingDietetics, Nutrition, and Education

Consensus Statement: Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition: Characteristics Recommended for the Identification and Documentation of Adult Malnutrition (Undernutrition)

White, Jane V., Guenter, Peggi, Jensen, Gordon, Malone, Ainsley, Schofield, Marsha, Academy Malnutrition Work Group, A.S.P.E.N. Malnutrition Task Force, and the A.S.P.E.N. Board of Directors·2012·Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition

Abstract

The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (Academy) and the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.) recommend that a standardized set of diagnostic characteristics be used to identify and document adult malnutrition in routine clinical practice. An etiologically based diagnostic nomenclature that incorporates a current understanding of the role of the inflammatory response on malnutrition's incidence, progression, and resolution is proposed. Universal use of a single set of diagnostic characteristics will facilitate malnutrition's recognition, contribute to more valid estimates of its prevalence and incidence, guide interventions, and influence expected outcomes. This standardized approach will also help to more accurately predict the human and financial burdens and costs associated with malnutrition's prevention and treatment and further ensure the provision of high‐quality, cost‐effective nutrition care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0148607112440285

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Despite global attempts to define malnutrition, such as consensus statements issued by ASPEN/AND and ESPEN, there is still no single unambiguous, objective, universally acknowledged consensus definition.

    “Despite global attempts to define malnutrition, such as consensus statements issued by the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN)/The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (AND) (13), the European Society of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) (14), we still lack a single unambiguous, objective, universally acknowledged consensus definition.”
  • Physical withering is still a key component of several criteria to diagnose malnutrition.

    “For example, physical withering is still a key component of several criteria to diagnose malnutrition (13), and the loss of both muscle and adipose tissue mass has recently been identified in diagnostic criteria (18).”
  • By incorporating inflammatory status and measures of muscle mass and function, the AND/ASPEN consensus statement represents a significant step forward in the development of a universal framework for the diagnosis of malnutrition.

    “By incorporating inflammatory status and measures of muscle mass and function, the AND/ASPEN consensus statement represents a significant step forward in the development of a universal framework for the diagnosis of malnutrition.”
  • The six characteristics put forward by AND/ASPEN include insufficient energy intake, weight loss, loss of subcutaneous fat, localized or generalized fluid accumulation that may mask weight loss, loss of muscle mass, and diminished functional status as measured by hand grip strength.

    “The six characteristics put forward include insufficient energy intake, weight loss, loss of subcutaneous fat, localized or generalized fluid accumulation that may mask weight loss, loss of muscle mass, and diminished functional status as measured by hand grip strength (Table 2).”
  • Once inflammation status is determined, the clinician can diagnose malnutrition if two or more out of six total characteristics are present.

    “Once inflammation status is determined, the clinician can diagnose malnutrition if two or more out of six total characteristics are present.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
White, J. V., Guenter, P., Jensen, G., Malone, A., Schofield, M., Academy Malnutrition Work Group, A.S.P.E.N. Malnutrition Task Force, & and the A.S.P.E.N. Board of Directors
Affiliations
  • University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Mount Carmel Health (US)
  • Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (US)
Corresponding author
White, Jane V.
Venue
Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-04-24
Volume
36
Issue
3
Pages
275-283
ISSN
  • 0148-6071 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-2444
OpenAlex
W2101880068
Cited by
1,284
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 66 · 2025: 101 · 2024: 97 · 2023: 125 · 2022: 120 · 2021: 125 · 2020: 109 · 2019: 98 · 2018: 91 · 2017: 69 · 2016: 74 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 56 · 2013: 60 · 2012: 11
FWCI
61.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education
Keywords
adult malnutrition, malnutrition diagnosis, diagnostic criteria, diagnostic terminology, inflammation
MeSH terms
Adult, Energy Intake, Edema, Humans, Inflammation, Muscular Atrophy, Terminology as Topic, Weight Loss, Hand Strength, Clinical Laboratory Techniques, Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures, Malnutrition, Subcutaneous Fat

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review