Cited by 154Sustainability and Ecological Systems AnalysisEnvironmental Impact and SustainabilitySustainable Development and Environmental Policy

Global Patterns and Trends for Non‐Metallic Minerals used for Construction

Miatto, Alessio, Schandl, Heinz, Fishman, Tomer, Tanikawa, Hiroki·2017·Journal of Industrial Ecology

Abstract

Summary: Despite accounting for almost 50% of global material use, nonmetallic minerals—mostly used for construction of buildings and infrastructure—are the material flow analysis (MFA) category with the highest uncertainty. The main reason for this is incomplete reporting in official national statistics because of ease of availability and the low per‐unit cost of these materials. However, the environmental burden associated with nonmetallic minerals, which include energy use for extraction and transport, land‐use change, and disposal of large amounts of construction demolition waste, call for a thorough understanding of the magnitude of nonmetallic mineral flows. Previous estimates for nonmetallic minerals have used simplistic assumptions. This study aims to increase the precision of nonmetallic mineral accounts at national and global level using consumption of bitumen, bricks, cement, and railways in combination with technical coefficients from the engineering literature to infer the actual yearly consumption of nonmetallic minerals. We estimate the extraction of nonmetallic minerals and provide uncertainty estimates for the new accounts as well as information about consumption by different sectors. Analyzing the evolution of consumption for seven world regions, we find that, in North America and Europe, the consumption of nonmetallic minerals over the past 40 years has followed the growth patterns of population, whereas for all other regions consumption has been closely related to gross domestic product (GDP). A more accurate account of global and country‐by‐country extraction of nonmetallic minerals may provide insights into supply shortages and inform waste management strategies for construction and demolition waste.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jiec.12471

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miatto, A., Schandl, H., Fishman, T., & Tanikawa, H.
Affiliations
  • Nagoya University (JP)
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
Corresponding author
Miatto, Alessio
Venue
Journal of Industrial Ecology
Published
2016-08-22
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
924-937
ISSN
  • 1088-1980 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-9290
OpenAlex
W2510605623
Cited by
154
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2
FWCI
5.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Industrial Ecology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of the Environment
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
Keywords
non-metallic minerals, building materials, material flow accounting, mining, mineral intake, bitumen, brick, cement, railways, construction and demolition waste, energy consumption, land use change, economic growth, uncertainty estimation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review