Cited by 65Sustainable Supply Chain ManagementMunicipal Solid Waste ManagementSustainable Design and Development

Recycling is not enough to make the world a greener place: Prospects for the circular economy

Open access
Guo, Jing, Ali, Saleem, Xu, Ming·2023·Green Carbon

Abstract

Perspectives will not have an abstract, but a stand-alone Perspective may have a graphical abstract when appropriate.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.greenca.2023.10.006

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guo, J., Ali, S., & Xu, M.
Affiliations
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
  • United Nations (US)
Corresponding author
Xu, Ming
Venue
Green Carbon
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-12
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
150-153
ISSN
2950-1555 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4388115874
Cited by
63
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 25
FWCI
13.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Green Carbon (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Design and Development
Keywords
circular economy, recycling, sustainability, resource efficiency, environmental impact

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review