Cited by 491Environmental Impact and SustainabilityExtraction and Separation ProcessesElectric Vehicles and Infrastructure

Life cycle analysis of lithium-ion batteries for automotive applications

Open access
Dai, Qiang, Kelly, Jarod C., Gaines, Linda, Wang, Michael·2019·Batteries

Abstract

In light of the increasing penetration of electric vehicles (EVs) in the global vehicle market, understanding the environmental impacts of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) that characterize the EVs is key to sustainable EV deployment. This study analyzes the cradle-to-gate total energy use, greenhouse gas emissions, SOx, NOx, PM10 emissions, and water consumption associated with current industrial production of lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide (NMC) batteries, with the battery life cycle analysis (LCA) module in the Greenhouse Gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy Use in Transportation (GREET) model, which was recently updated with primary data collected from large-scale commercial battery material producers and automotive LIB manufacturers. The results show that active cathode material, aluminum, and energy use for cell production are the major contributors to the energy and environmental impacts of NMC batteries. However, this study also notes that the impacts could change significantly, depending on where in the world the battery is produced, and where the materials are sourced. In an effort to harmonize existing LCAs of automotive LIBs and guide future research, this study also lays out differences in life cycle inventories (LCIs) for key battery materials among existing LIB LCA studies, and identifies knowledge gaps.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/batteries5020048

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Water use during manufacturing is relatively small at this life cycle stage compared to upstream extractive processes and consumes just 7% of the overall embodied water in a lithium-ion battery.

    “Water use during manufacturing is relatively small at this life cycle stage compared to upstream extractive processes and consumes just 7% of the overall embodied water in a lithium-ion battery”

    From Lithium and water: Hydrosocial impacts across the life cycle of energy storage (2024) · cites this paper as Dai et al., 2019

    Section 3.2.3 links substantial battery water consumption to upstream aluminum production and cobalt ore mining and processing. Our copy does not state that manufacturing accounts for 7% of embodied water or quantify its water use relative to those processes. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • One study found that 50.8% of water use in the life cycle of photovoltaics is in the preparedness of the mining powders.

    “One study found that 50.8% of water use in the life cycle of photovoltaics is in the preparedness of the mining powders”

    From Lithium and water: Hydrosocial impacts across the life cycle of energy storage (2024) · cites this paper as Dai et al., 2019

    Section 3.2.3 discusses water consumption in the lithium-ion battery supply chain, including aluminum and cobalt processing, not photovoltaics. Searches for “50.8%,” photovoltaics, and mining-powder preparation found no passage supporting the claimed percentage or life-cycle stage; page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The production carbon footprint of a LIB is primarily made up of energy contributions, traced to cathode active material production and cell manufacturing, and material contributions associated with upstream mining/refining of key battery materials.

    “The production CF of a LIB is primarily made up of energy contributions, traced to cathode active material production and cell manufacturing, and material contributions associated with upstream mining/refining of key battery materials (Chordia et al., 2021;Dai et al., 2019;Kallitsis et al., 2020).”
  • Dai et al. (2019) reported a 72.9 kg CO2-eq kWh-1 for an NMC111 battery produced in the United States, falling within the lower whisker values reported for North America in Fig. 5.

    “Dai et al. (2019) reported a 72.9 kg CO 2 -eq kWh -1 for an NMC111 battery produced in the United States, falling within the lower whisker values reported for North America in Fig. 5.”
  • The production of battery materials and subsequent LIB cell manufacturing contribute considerably to greenhouse gas emissions.

    “the production of battery materials4–7 and the subsequent LIB cell manufacturing8–10 contribute considerably to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dai, Q., Kelly, J. C., Gaines, L., & Wang, M.
Affiliations
Argonne National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Dai, Qiang
Venue
Batteries
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-06-01
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
48
ISSN
2313-0105 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2947177723
Cited by
491
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 81 · 2025: 86 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 80 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 3
FWCI
18.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Batteries (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Energy (DE-AC02-06CH11357)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Extraction and Separation Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Keywords
lithium-ion batteries, electric vehicles, NCM cathode, life cycle assessment, cradle-to-gate emissions, energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions, air pollutant emissions, water consumption, battery cell manufacturing, aluminum, GREET model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review