Cited by 99Genetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

Consistency between research and clinical diagnoses of autism among boys and girls with fragile X syndrome

Open access
Klusek, J., Martin, G. E., Losh, M.·2014·Journal of Intellectual Disability Research

Abstract

Background: Prior research suggests that 60–74% of males and 16–45% of females with fragile X syndrome (FXS) meet criteria for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in research settings. However, relatively little is known about the rates of clinical diagnoses in FXS and whether such diagnoses are consistent with those performed in a research setting using gold standard diagnostic tools. Method: This study explored whether boys and girls with FXS met criteria for ASD in a research setting using the A utism D iagnostic O bservation S chedule (ADOS) and the A utism D iagnostic I nterview‐R evised (ADI‐R), and then compared these data with the frequency of parent‐reported clinical diagnoses. We also examined child and family characteristics as potential diagnostic predictors across settings. Participants included 35 females and 51 males with FXS (mean age: 10 years), who were from Eastern and Midwestern regions of the USA. Results: About half of the children met criteria for ASD on either the ADOS or ADI‐R, with ASD occurring three times more frequently in males than females (∼75% vs. ∼25%). In contrast, ∼25% of participants of both genders had received a clinical diagnosis of ASD. While cognitive and language skills predicted diagnostic outcome on the ADOS and ADI‐R, these skills did not predict clinical diagnoses. Executive functions predicted clinical diagnoses, but not diagnoses per the ADOS or ADI‐R. Conclusions: ASD in FXS may be under‐diagnosed in clinical/educational settings, which raises questions regarding access to ASD‐related services.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jir.12121

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Budmirovic reference: Budimirovic DB Bukelis I Cox C Gray RM Tierney E Kaufmann WE 2006 Autism spectrum disorder in fragile X syndrome: Differential contribution of adaptive socialization and social withdrawal American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A 140 1814 1826 16906564
  2. Darnell JC Klann E 2013 The translation of translational control by FMRP: Therapeutic targets for FXS Nature Neuroscience 16 1530 1536 PMC3999698 23584741
  3. Hagerman RJ Narcisa V Hagerman PJ Amaral DG Geschwind DH Dawson G 2011 Fragile X: a molecular and treatment model for autism spectrum disorders Autism Spectrum Disorders 801 11 Oxford University Press New York

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Klusek, J., Martin, G. E., & Losh, M.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Losh, M.
Venue
Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-02-17
Volume
58
Issue
10
Pages
940-952
ISSN
  • 0964-2633 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2788
OpenAlex
W2106217747
Cited by
99
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5
FWCI
5.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Intellectual Disability Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD0388190, R01HD038819, R01HD044935)
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (1R01DC010191, R03DC010880)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH091131)
  • National Fragile X Foundation
  • Ireland Family Foundation
  • Research Participant Registry Core of the Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities (P30HD03110)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
fragile X syndrome, autism spectrum disorder, diagnosis, research diagnosis, sex differences, executive function, diagnostic predictors
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Child, Preschool, Female, Fragile X Syndrome, Humans, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Comorbidity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review