Cited by 299Genetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersDown syndrome and intellectual disability researchWilliams Syndrome Research

Fragile X Syndrome

Hagerman, Randi Jenssen·2002·Johns Hopkins University Press eBooks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.56021/9780801868436

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hagerman, R. J.
Corresponding author
Hagerman, Randi Jenssen
Venue
Johns Hopkins University Press eBooks
Published
2002
OpenAlex
W4319589137
Cited by
299
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 26
FWCI
6.87
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Johns Hopkins University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Williams Syndrome Research
Keywords
fragile X syndrome, FMR1 gene, FMRP, trinucleotide repeat expansion, intellectual disability, fragile X premutation, fragile X-associated disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review