Cited by 4Resilience and Mental HealthMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumFamily and Disability Support Research

Relationship between stressors, stress reactions and hardiness in Japanese mothers of early neonatal babies: A cross‐sectional study

Konno, Kazuho·2021·Japan Journal of Nursing Science

Abstract

Aim: Mothers of early neonatal babies are often in stressful situations. The stress of child rearing has been reported to influence the mental health of mothers. Hardiness, one of the individual factors affecting the cognitive evaluation of stress, may relate to stress for mothers of early neonatal babies. The aim of the present study is to clarify the relationship between stressors, stress reactions and hardiness of mothers with early neonatal babies. Methods: We conducted a cross‐sectional study using self‐administered questionnaires. Survey items included demographic characteristics, hardiness, stressors, and stress reactions. A total of 226 mothers returned the completed questionnaire. Data analyzed correlation, t tests and multiple regression using SPSS 24.0. Results: The mothers' hardiness was not related to their demographic characteristics. Hardiness had a negative correlation with stressors and stress reactions. Hardiness mitigated especially anxiety/uncertainty and depression/feeling of insufficiency. Compared with those with high levels of hardiness, mothers with low hardiness exhibited higher levels of newborn baby stressors, breast‐feeding stressors, anxiety/uncertainty and depression/feeling of insufficiency. Conclusion: Hardiness showed a buffering relationship with stressors and stress reactions, especially anxiety. Understanding hardiness levels may be useful for choosing which nursing care methods are implemented as each mother begins child rearing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jjns.12381

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Konno, K.
Affiliations
Faculty of Health Care, Department of Nursing Teikyo Heisei University Tokyo Japan
Venue
Japan Journal of Nursing Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-09-23
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
e12381-e12381
ISSN
  • 1742-7924 (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-7932
OpenAlex
W3088525625
Cited by
4
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Japan Journal of Nursing Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
Keywords
hardiness, maternal stress, stressors, stress reactions, anxiety, depression, buffering effect, maternal mental health, parenting
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Japan, Mothers, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review