Cited by 3Physical Activity and HealthMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDiabetes Management and Research

The effect of real-time monitoring of physical activity intensity in diabetic patients

Tanaka, Rumi, Fujita, Kimie, Maeno, Satoko, Yakushiji, Kanako, Tanaka, Satomi, Ohnaka, Keizo, Ashida, Kenji, Sakamoto, Shohei +1 more·2022·Japan Journal of Nursing Science

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the effects of an intensity display type accelerometer on diabetic patients' physical activity. METHODS: This was a two-arm, non-randomized controlled study. Both groups received information about the recommendation of 150 min/week moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). The intervention group used an intensity display type accelerometer to monitor their physical activity intensity for 10 days at baseline and 3 months later. We compared intervention and control groups after 3 and 6 months. Primary outcomes were MVPA and number of steps over 7 days. Secondary outcomes were glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), body mass index, and self-management. RESULTS: Of 62 participants, 30 and 32 were included in the intervention and control groups, respectively. Mean age in each group was 59.7 ± 10.8 and 58.8 ± 10.2 years, and mean HbA1c was 6.9 ± 0.9% and 6.9 ± 0.8%, respectively. There were no significant differences between the intervention and control groups at either time point, and no outcomes showed significant changes. In a subgroup analysis by physical activity intensity, MVPA of active individuals in the control group significantly decreased at 6 months from baseline. MVPA and number of steps among inactive individuals in the intervention group significantly increased at 6 months from baseline. Self-management of the intervention group showed a trend toward improvement, but HbA1c and body mass index showed no significant change. CONCLUSIONS: Monitoring physical activity intensity led to increased MVPA of inactive patients and maintained MVPA of active patients with diabetes mellitus. This straightforward intervention could be applied in clinical practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jjns.12445

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tanaka, R., Fujita, K., Maeno, S., Yakushiji, K., Tanaka, S., Ohnaka, K., Ashida, K., Sakamoto, S., & Nomura, M.
Affiliations
  • Kitasato University (JP)
  • Kyushu University (JP)
  • Kurume University (JP)
Corresponding author
Fujita, Kimie
Venue
Japan Journal of Nursing Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-08-05
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
e12445-e12445
ISSN
  • 1742-7924 (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-7932
OpenAlex
W3190857720
Cited by
3
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Japan Journal of Nursing Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (18K08520, 19K11141, 20K08921)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
diabetes mellitus, physical activity intensity, real-time activity monitoring, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, step count, HbA1c, body mass index, self-management, physical activity promotion
MeSH terms
Aged, Diabetes Mellitus, Humans, Middle Aged, Exercise, Body Mass Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review