Cited by 88Global Maternal and Child HealthMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareHomicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse

A Qualitative Study of Attitudes and Values Surrounding Stillbirth and Neonatal Mortality Among Grandmothers, Mothers, and Unmarried Girls in Rural Amhara and Oromiya Regions, Ethiopia: Unheard Souls in the Backyard

Open access
Sisay, Mitike Molla, Yirgu, Robel, Gobezayehu, Abebe Gebremariam, Sibley, Lynn M.·2014·Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health

Abstract

Introduction: In Ethiopia, neonatal mortality and stillbirth are high and underreported. This study explored values related to neonatal mortality and stillbirth and the visibility of these deaths in rural Ethiopia among 3 generations of women. Methods: We conducted a qualitative study in 6 rural districts of the Oromiya and Amhara regional states during May 2012. We included 30 focus groups representing grandmothers, married women (mothers), and unmarried girls in randomly selected kebeles (villages). Results: Until the 40th day of life, neonates are considered to be strangers to the community (not human). Their deaths are not talked about; they are buried in the house or in the backyard. Mothers are forbidden to mourn their loss lest they offend God and bring on future neonatal losses. Women who repeatedly lose their neonates may be blamed, mistreated, and dishonored through divorce. Neonatal death and stillbirth are attributed to supernatural powers, although some women and girls associate these deaths with poverty and lack of education. The desire for increased visibility of neonatal death is mixed. Unlike the grandmothers and unmarried girls, most of the married women want death to be visible to draw the attention of policy makers. Women prefer home birth and consider themselves lucky to be able to give birth at home. At present, there is no national vital registration system. Discussion: Neonatal death and stillbirth are hidden and the magnitude is likely underrepresented. The delayed recognition of personhood, attribution of death to supernatural causes, social repercussions for women who experience a pregnancy loss, preference for home birth, and lack of a vital registration system all contribute to the invisibility of perinatal deaths. Increasing the visibility of (and counting) these deaths may require multifaceted behavior‐change interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jmwh.12156

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A big percentage of perinatal losses are overlooked or not declared due to deficient or ineffective data collection systems.

    “However, according with some authors (Cassidy, 2018; Duke et al., 2010; Sisay et al., 2014), a big percentage of perinatal losses are overlooked or not declared due to deficient or ineffective data collection systems.”

    From Integrative Review of Emotional Care Following Perinatal Loss (2021) · cites this paper as Sisay et al., 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sisay, M. M., Yirgu, R., Gobezayehu, A. G., & Sibley, L. M.
Affiliations
Tikur Anbessa Hospital (ET)
Corresponding author
Sisay, Mitike Molla
Venue
Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-01
Volume
59
Issue
s1
Pages
S110-7
ISSN
  • 1526-9523 (ISSN-L)
  • 1542-2011
OpenAlex
W2096148468
Cited by
88
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2
FWCI
5.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Midwifery & Women s Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
Keywords
stillbirth, neonatal mortality, perinatal death, attitudes toward death, supernatural beliefs, social stigma, home birth, civil registration, underreporting of deaths, rural Ethiopia, Amhara region, women's health
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Attitude, Child, Ethiopia, Family Characteristics, Female, Home Childbirth, Humans, Infant, Infant Mortality, Infant, Newborn, Middle Aged, Mothers, Pregnancy, Rural Population, Single Person, Social Values, Women, Focus Groups, Marital Status, Qualitative Research, Stillbirth, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review