Cited by 102Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthGlobal Maternal and Child HealthMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

Parents’ and healthcare professionals’ experiences of care after stillbirth in low‐and middle‐income countries: a systematic review and meta‐summary

Open access
Shakespeare, C, Merriel, A, Bakhbakhi, D, Baneszova, R, Barnard, K, Lynch, M, Storey, C, Blencowe, H +6 more·2019·BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stillbirth has a profound impact on women, families, and healthcare workers. The burden is highest in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). There is need for respectful and supportive care for women, partners, and families after bereavement. OBJECTIVE: To perform a qualitative meta-summary of parents' and healthcare professionals' experiences of care after stillbirth in LMICs. SEARCH STRATEGY: Search terms were formulated by identifying all synonyms, thesaurus terms, and variations for stillbirth. Databases searched were AMED, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsychINFO, BNI, CINAHL. SELECTION CRITERIA: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method studies that addressed parents' or healthcare professionals' experience of care after stillbirth in LMICs. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Studies were screened, and data extracted in duplicate. Data were analysed using the Sandelowski meta-summary technique that calculates frequency and intensity effect sizes (FES/IES). MAIN RESULTS: In all, 118 full texts were screened, and 34 studies from 17 countries were included. FES range was 15-68%. Most studies had IES 1.5-4.5. Women experience a broad range of manifestations of grief following stillbirth, which may not be recognised by healthcare workers or in their communities. Lack of recognition exacerbates negative experiences of stigmatisation, blame, devaluation, and loss of social status. Adequately developed health systems, with trained and supported staff, are best equipped to provide the support and information that women want after stillbirth. CONCLUSIONS: Basic interventions could have an immediate impact on the experiences of women and their families after stillbirth. Examples include public education to reduce stigma, promoting the respectful maternity care agenda, and investigating stillbirth appropriately. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Reducing stigma, promoting respectful care and investigating stillbirth have a positive impact after stillbirth for women and families in LMICs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1471-0528.15430

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [8]8. Covidence systematic review software. Melbourne, Australia: Veritas Health Innovation;
  2. [24]24. dos Santos ALD, Rosenburg CP, Buralli KO. [Histories of fetal losses told by women: research qualitative study]. Rev Saude Publica [Internet]. 2004 Apr;38(2):268 -76. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci\_arttext&pid=S003489102004000200017&lng=pt&tlng=pt
  3. [35]35. Sutan R, Amin RM, Ariffin KB, Teng TZ, Kamal MF, Rusli RZ. Psychosocial impact of mothers with perinatal loss and its contributing factors: an insight. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B [Internet]. 2010;11(3):209 -17. Available from:

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shakespeare, C., Merriel, A., Bakhbakhi, D., Baneszova, R., Barnard, K., Lynch, M., Storey, C., Blencowe, H., Boyle, F., Flenady, V, Gold, K., Horey, D., Mills, T., & Siassakos, D.
Affiliations
  • Southmead Hospital (GB)
  • University Hospital Bratislava (SK)
  • North Bristol NHS Trust (GB)
  • International Stillbirth Alliance Bristol UK
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • La Trobe University (AU)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Shakespeare, C
Venue
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-09-17
Volume
126
Issue
1
Pages
12-21
ISSN
  • 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-0328
  • 1471-0528
OpenAlex
W2886009481
Cited by
102
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5
FWCI
1.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Explore Bristol Research (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (DRF-2017-10-130, CL-2016-25-001, ACF-2015-25-006)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
stillbirth, grief, stigma, respectful maternity care, parental experiences, health professionals' experiences, low- and middle-income countries, social status loss, bereavement support
MeSH terms
Disenfranchised Grief, Attitude of Health Personnel, Developing Countries, Female, Humans, Parents, Postnatal Care, Pregnancy, Stereotyping, Qualitative Research, Stillbirth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review