Cited by 82Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthGlobal Maternal and Child HealthMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

The psychological, social, and economic impact of stillbirth on families

Murphy, Samantha, Cacciatore, Joanne·2017·Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

Abstract

This article reviews the current state of psychological, social, and economic research into the impact of stillbirth on families. We argue that whereas the knowledge we have of the experiential aspects of stillbirth is increasing, there is still much that remains to be uncovered especially in respect of the impact that seeing the baby may have on mental health. Moreover, the experience of particular social groups merits further work, most notably regarding same-sex couples and surrogates, mothers and fathers drawn from Black and Minority Ethnic groups as well as those from lower socio-economic groups. Particular attention needs to be paid to the economic impact of stillbirth on families, whether this is from a perspective that focuses on the family or the wider society in which they live.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.siny.2017.02.002

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The database searches identified 1529 potentially eligible studies, and a further 23 articles were sourced manually, resulting in a total of 1552 articles; 46 studies were selected for inclusion.

    “The database searches identified 1529 potentially eligible studies. A further 23 articles were sourced manually from database-identified articles and systematic reviews [27, 37, 38], resulting in a total of 1552 articles. Following removal of duplicates and screening, a total of 46 studies were selected for inclusion in the final analysis”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Murphy, S., & Cacciatore, J.
Affiliations
  • The Open University (GB)
  • Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
Murphy, Samantha
Venue
Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-06
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
129-134
ISSN
1744-165X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2588139059
Cited by
82
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4
FWCI
1.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research Online (The Open University) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
stillbirth, family impact, maternal mental health, social impact, economic impact, same-sex couples, surrogacy, socioeconomic status, perinatal loss
MeSH terms
Adult, Bereavement, Family, Family Characteristics, Female, Humans, Male, Pregnancy, Social Support, Parenting, Health Care Costs, Cost of Illness, Stillbirth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review