Cited by 54Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumDigital Mental Health InterventionsMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

Telephone‐Administered Interpersonal Psychotherapy by Nurse‐Midwives for Postpartum Depression

Posmontier, Bobbie, Neugebauer, Richard, Stuart, Scott, Chittams, Jesse, Shaughnessy, Rita·2016·Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health

Abstract

Introduction: Postpartum depression (PPD) affects 7% to 13% of childbearing women. Access to care may be limited by maternal time constraints and fears of being judged, labeled as mentally ill, and having their infants taken away. The study's objective was to test the feasibility, effectiveness, and acceptability of certified nurse‐midwife telephone‐administered interpersonal psychotherapy (CNM‐IPT) as a treatment for PPD. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted from 2010 to 2014. A sample of women meeting Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Version 4, Text Revision (DSM‐IV‐TR) criteria for depression was recruited from 8 obstetric practices employing CNMs in the United States. Forty‐one women in the treatment group received up to eight 50‐minute CNM‐IPT sessions, and 20 in the control group were referred to mental health professionals. The main outcome measure was the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. Secondary outcomes included maternal and marital functioning, mother‐infant bonding, social support, and client satisfaction. Results: The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression at 8 and 12 weeks was significantly lower among women in the treatment group compared to the control group (Week 8, P = .047; Week 12, P = .029). Client satisfaction was high in both groups. While only 5 out of 8 CNM‐IPT counselors continued the intervention until the study's conclusion, CNM‐IPT counselor protocol adherence was high. Discussion: CNM‐IPT is effective and acceptable as a method of reducing the severity of PPD symptoms. Careful assessment of CNM availability is critical to intervention feasibility. Future research is needed to evaluate translation of this intervention into practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jmwh.12411

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Posmontier, B., Neugebauer, R., Stuart, S., Chittams, J., & Shaughnessy, R.
Affiliations
Drexel University (US)
Corresponding author
Posmontier, Bobbie
Venue
Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-03-10
Volume
61
Issue
4
Pages
456-466
ISSN
  • 1526-9523 (ISSN-L)
  • 1542-2011
OpenAlex
W2295193201
Cited by
54
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
FWCI
3.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Midwifery & Women s Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH-5R21MH86610-2)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
postpartum depression, interpersonal psychotherapy, certified nurse-midwives, feasibility and acceptability, maternal mental health, mother-infant bonding, social support, marital functioning, client satisfaction, counselor retention
MeSH terms
Adult, Feasibility Studies, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Nurse Midwives, Prospective Studies, Psychotherapy, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Telemedicine, Depression, Postpartum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review