Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 369

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 80 of the 80 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Current and experimental treatments of Parkinson disease: A guide for neuroscientists

Open access
Oertel, Wolfgang, Schulz, Jörg B.·2016·Journal of Neurochemistry

Abstract

Over a period of more than 50 years, the symptomatic treatment of the motor symptoms of Parkinson disease (PD) has been optimized using pharmacotherapy, deep brain stimulation, and physiotherapy. The arsenal of pharmacotherapies includes L‐Dopa, several dopamine agonists, inhibitors of monoamine oxidase (MAO)‐B and catechol‐o‐methyltransferase (COMT), and amantadine. In the later course of the disease, motor complications occur, at which stage different oral formulations of L‐Dopa or dopamine agonists with long half‐life, a transdermal application or parenteral pumps for continuous drug supply can be subscribed. Alternatively, the patient is offered deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) or the internal part of the globus pallidus (GP i). For a more efficacious treatment of motor complications, new formulations of L‐Dopa, dopamine agonists, and amantadine as well as new MAO‐B and COMT inhibitors are currently tested in clinical trials, and some of them already yielding positive results in phase 3 trials. In addition, non‐dopaminergic agents have been tested in the early clinical phase for the treatment of motor fluctuations and dyskinesia, including adenosine A2A antagonists (istradefylline, preladenant, and tozadenant) and modulators of the metabolic glutamate receptor 5 (mG luR5 ‐ mavoglurant) and serotonin (eltoprazine) receptors. Recent clinical trials testing coenzyme Q10, the dopamine agonist pramipexole, creatine monohydrate, pioglitazone, or AAV‐mediated gene therapy aimed at increasing expression of neurturin, did not prove efficacious. Treatment with nicotine, caffeine, inosine (a precursor of urate), and isradipine (a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker), as well as active and passive immunization against α‐synuclein and inhibitors or modulators of α‐synuclein‐aggregation are currently studied in clinical trials. However, to date, no disease‐modifying treatment is available. We here review the current status of treatment options for motor and non‐motor symptoms, and discuss current investigative strategies for disease modification. This review provides basic insights, mainly addressing basic scientists and non‐specialists. It stresses the need to intensify therapeutic PD research and points out reasons why the translation of basic research to disease‐modifying therapies has been unsuccessful so far. image The symptomatic treatment of the motor symptoms of Parkinson disease (PD) has been constantly optimized using pharmacotherapy (L‐Dopa, several dopamine agonists, inhibitors of monoamine oxidase (MAO)‐B and catechol‐o‐methyltransferase (COMT), and amantadine), deep brain stimulation, and physiotherapy. For a more efficacious treatment of motor complications, new formulations of L‐Dopa, dopamine agonists, and amantadine as well as new MAO‐B and COMT inhibitors are currently tested in clinical trials. Non‐dopaminergic agents have been tested in the early clinical phase for the treatment of motor fluctuations and dyskinesia. Recent clinical trials testing coenzyme Q10, the dopamine agonist pramipexole, creatine monohydrate, pioglitazone, or AAV‐mediated gene therapy aimed at increasing expression of neurturin, did not prove efficacious. Treatment with nicotine, caffeine, and isradipine – a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker – as well as active and passive immunization against α‐synuclein and inhibitors of α‐synuclein‐aggregation are currently studied in clinical trials. However, to date, no disease‐modifying treatment is available for PD. We here review the current status of treatment options and investigative strategies for both motor and non‐motor symptoms. This review stresses the need to intensify therapeutic PD research and points out reasons why the translation of basic research to disease‐modifying therapies has been unsuccessful so far. This article is part of a special issue on Parkinson disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jnc.13750

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 80 references

Cited by

See all 369

Metadata

Authors
Oertel, W., & Schulz, J. B.
Venue
Journal of Neurochemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-08-30
Volume
139
Issue
S1
Pages
325-337
ISSN
  • 0022-3042 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-4159
OpenAlex
W2516348886
Cited by
369
References
80
FWCI
27.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Current and experimental treatments of Parkinson disease: A guide for neuroscientists. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/jnc.13750
The paper
Oertel, W., & Schulz, J. B. (2016). Current and experimental treatments of Parkinson disease: A guide for neuroscientists. Journal of Neurochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.13750

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.