Comfort and Attitudes Towards Robots Among Young, Middle‐Aged, and Older Adults: A Cross‐Sectional Study
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: To explore the social impact of, comfort with, and negative attitudes towards robots among young, middle‐aged, and older adults in the United States. Design: Descriptive, cross‐sectional. Conducted in 2014–2015 in an urban area of the western United States using a purposive sample of adults 18 years of age or older. Methods: Respondents completed a survey that included the Negative Attitudes Toward Robots Scale (NARS) and two questions taken or modified from the European Commission's Autonomous System 2015 Report. Analyses were conducted to compare perceptions and demographic factors by age groups (young adults:18–44, middle‐aged adults: 45–64, and older adults: >65 years old). Findings: Sample included 499 individuals (n = 322 age 18–44 years, n = 50 age 45–64 years, and n = 102 age 65–98 years). There were no significant differences between age groups for 9 of the 11 items regarding social impact of robots and comfort with robots. There were no significant differences by age groups for 9 of the 14 items in the NARS. Among those items with statistically significant differences, the mean scores indicate similar sentiments for each group. Conclusions: Older, middle‐aged, and younger adults had similar attitudes regarding the social impact of and comfort with robots; they also had similar negative attitudes towards robots. Findings dispel current perceptions that older adults are not as receptive to robots as other adults. This has implications for nurses who integrate supportive robots in their practice. Clinical Relevance: Nurses working in clinical and community roles can use these findings when developing and implementing robotic solutions. Understanding attitudes towards robots can support how, where, and with whom robots can be used in nursing practice.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Younger, mid-aged and older adults have similar attitudes towards comfort and social impacts of robots.
“Researchers have also studied how people from different age groups perceive robots, finding that younger, mid-aged and older adults have similar attitudes towards comfort and social impacts of robots [3].”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2000) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 355,706 · see citing works
Harris, P. A., Taylor, R., Thielke, R., Payne, J., Gonzalez, N., & Conde, J. G. (2009) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010 · Cited by 51,384 · see citing works
<b>lavaan</b> : An <i>R</i> Package for Structural Equation Modeling
Rosseel, Y. (2012) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i02 · Cited by 27,955 · see citing works
A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926 · Cited by 23,066 · see citing works
(1998) · Cited by 13,501 · see citing works
Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students
Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1211286109 · Cited by 3,150 · see citing works
Assistive social robots in elderly care: a review
Broekens, J., Heerink, M., & Rosendal, H. (2009) · Gerontechnology · doi:10.4017/gt.2009.08.02.002.00 · Cited by 950 · see citing works
Acceptance of Healthcare Robots for the Older Population: Review and Future Directions
Broadbent, E., Stafford, R., & MacDonald, B. (2009) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-009-0030-6 · Cited by 887 · see citing works
Nomura, T., Kanda, T., & Suzuki, T. (2005) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-005-0012-7 · Cited by 530 · see citing works
Domestic robots for older adults: attitudes, preferences, and potential
Smarr, C.-A., Mitzner, T. L., Beer, J. M., Prakash, A., Chen, T. L., Kemp, C. C., & Rogers, W. A. (2014) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-013-0220-0 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
What do people expect from robots?
Ray, C., Mondada, F., & Siegwart, R. (2008) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros.2008.4650714 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Stafford, R. Q., MacDonald, B. A., Jayawardena, C., Wegner, D. M., & Broadbent, E. (2013) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-013-0186-y · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Libin, A., & Libin, E. V. (2004) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2004.835366 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Lavy, V., & Sand, E. (2015) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w20909 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
The domesticated robot: design guidelines for assisting older adults to age in place
Beer, J. M., Smarr, C.-A., Chen, T. L., Prakash, A., Mitzner, T. L., Kemp, C. C., & Rogers, W. A. (2012) · Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/2157689.2157806 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Reich-Stiebert, N., & Eyssel, F. (2015) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-015-0308-9 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
A Short History of Cleaning Robots
Prassler, E. A., Ritter, A., Schaeffer, C. F., et al. (2000) · Autonomous Robots · doi:10.1023/a:1008974515925 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Cultural design of domestic robots: A study of user expectations in Korea and the United States
Lee, H. R., Sung, J.-Y., Šabanović, S., & Han, J. (2012) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/roman.2012.6343850 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Wang, L., Rau, P. P., Evers, V., Robinson, B. K., & HINDS, P. J. (2010) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/1734454.1734578 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Improved robot attitudes and emotions at a retirement home after meeting a robot
Stafford, R. Q., Broadbent, E., Jayawardena, C., Unger, U., Kuo, I. H., Igic, A., Wong, R., Kerse, N. M., Watson, C. I., & MacDonald, B. A. (2010) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/roman.2010.5598679 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Retirement home staff and residents' preferences for healthcare robots
Broadbent, E., Tamagawa, R., Kerse, N., Knock, B., Patience, A., & MacDonald, B. (2009) · RO-MAN 2009 - The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication · doi:10.1109/roman.2009.5326284 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Hall, A. K., Backonja, U., Painter, I., Cakmak, M., Sung, M., Lau, T., Thompson, H. J., & Demiris, G. (2019) · Assistive Technology · doi:10.1080/10400435.2017.1396565 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Self-citationRobotics to Enable Older Adults to Remain Living at Home
Pearce, A. J., Adair, B., Miller, K., Ozanne, E., Said, C. M., Santamaria, N., & Morris, M. E. (2012) · Journal of Aging Research · doi:10.1155/2012/538169 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Learning about, from, and with Robots: Students' Perspectives
Shin, N., & Kim, S. (2007) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/roman.2007.4415235 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Older adults' medication management in the home: How can robots help?
Prakash, A., Beer, J. M., Deyle, T., Smarr, C.-A., Chen, T. L. B., Mitzner, T. L., Kemp, C. C., & Rogers, W. A. (2013) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1109/hri.2013.6483600 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Using the "negative attitude toward robots scale" with telepresence robots
Tsui, K. M., Desai, M., Yanco, H. A., et al. (2010) · doi:10.1145/2377576.2377621 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Demiris, G. (2009) · Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) · doi:10.1109/iembs.2009.5333800 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Self-citationOlder adults' reactions to a robot's appearance in the context of home use
Prakash, A., Kemp, C. C., & Rogers, W. A. (2014) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/2559636.2559790 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- European Union. (2015). Special Eurobarometer 427 “autonomous systems.” Brussels, Belgium: United Nations. doi: 10.2759/413916 · DOI
- Pollack ME, Brown L, Colbry D, Orosz C, Peintner B, Ramakrishnan S, Engber S, Matthews JT, Dunbar-Jacobs J, McCarthy CE, Thrun S, Montemerlo M, Pineau J, Roy N (2002). Pearl: A mobile robotic assistant for the elderly In Proceedings of the AAAI 2002 Workshop on Automation as Caregiver: The Role of Intelligent Rechnology in Elder care. Edmondton, Alberta, Canada (pp. 85– 91). Menlo Park, California: The AAAI Press.
- Syrdal DS, Dautenhahn K, Koay KL, & Walters ML (2009). The negative attitudes towards robot’s scale and reactions to robot behaviour in a live human-robot interaction study In Proceedings new frontiers in human-robot interaction, a symposium at the AISB2009 convention, Edinburgh, Scotland (pp. 109– 115). London, United Kingdom: Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behaviour.
- Weiss A, Beer J, Shibata T, & Vincze M (2014). Socially assistive robots for the aging population In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI ‘14), Bielefeld, Germany (pp. 497– 498) New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM).doi: 10.1145/2559636.256002 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Predicted Influences of Artificial Intelligence on the Domains of Nursing: Scoping Review
Buchanan, C., Howitt, M. L., Wilson, R., Booth, R. G., Risling, T., & Bamford, M. (2020) · JMIR Nursing · doi:10.2196/23939 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Pradhan, A., Findlater, L., & Lazar, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3359316 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Self-citationBusse, T. S., Kernebeck, S., Nef, L., Rebacz, P., Kickbusch, I., & Ehlers, J. P. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/20046 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
- Authors
- Backonja, U., Hall, A. K., Painter, I., Kneale, L., Lazar, A., Cakmak, M., Thompson, H. J., & Demiris, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington Tacoma (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- Computer Science and Engineering Department University of Washington Seattle WA USA
- Corresponding author
- Backonja, Uba
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Nursing Scholarship
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-09-19
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 623-633
- ISSN
- 0363-2792 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-6546
- 1547-5069
- PMC
- PMC6349682
- OpenAlex
- W2898585691
- Cited by
- 68
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 4
- FWCI
- 7.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Nursing Scholarship (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- University of Washington Tacoma Digital Commons (University of Washington Tacoma) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- University of Washington (T15LM007442)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
- Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
- Keywords
- attitudes toward robots, social impact of robots, age differences, older adults, young adults, middle-aged adults, nursing robots, human-robot interaction, nursing practice
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attitude, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Robotics, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
