CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 286Agriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentExtractivism and Socioeconomic IssuesLatin American rural development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 101 of the 105 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Accumulation by Dispossession and Socio‐Environmental Conflicts Caused by the Expansion of Agribusiness in Argentina

Open access
Cáceres, Daniel M.·2015·Journal of Agrarian Change
DOI 10.1111/joac.12057
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Drawing upon the concept of ‘accumulation by dispossession’, this paper analyses the expansion of agrarian capital in A rgentina. A case study illustrates the social and environmental impacts of the expansion of agribusiness in central A rgentina and the social struggle – both rural and urban – that has arisen to resist this process. Although government policies after the 2001 crisis differ in many ways from those of the 1990s, current agrarian policies are not significantly distinct from those followed during the pre‐crisis neoliberal period. Rather than ‘post‐neoliberal’, the new model could thus be better described as ‘neo‐extractivist’. With the connivance of the state, agribusiness is producing the largest‐ever transformation of natural capital into economic capital in the history of the region. Moreover, the latest policy developments suggest that A rgentina is on the threshold of a new and deeper stage of agrarian capital expansion and wealth concentration, this time operating at a much larger scale.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/joac.12057

Cites

101 of 101 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 105 references

4 of the 105 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Araghi F., 2010, Accumulation by Displacement: Global Enclosures, Food Crisis, and the Ecological Contradictions of Capitalism, Review: A Journal of the Fernand Braudel Center, 34, 113
  2. Bisio C., 2011, Repensar la agricultura familiar: aportes para desentrañar la complejidad agraria pampeana, 77
  3. Bueres A., 2004, Código civil comentado
  4. Calvo S.C., 2008, El balance de la economía Argentina 2008, 1
  5. Cohan L., 2011, Panorama general de las nuevas formas de organización del agro: las principales cadenas agroalimentarias
  6. Composto C., 2012, Minería a gran escala y control social: apuntes de investigación sobre el caso argentino, A Contracorriente, 9, 254
  7. Craviotti C., 2011, VII Jornadas Interdisciplinarias de Estudios Agrarios y Agroindustriales
  8. Cruzate G.A., 2012, Extracción y balance de nutrientes en los suelos agrícolas de la Argentina, Informaciones Agronómicas de Hispanoamérica, 6, 1
  9. De Angelis M., 2001, Marx and Primitive Accumulation: The Continuous Character of Capital's “Enclosures, The Commoner, 2, 1
  10. DGEC (Dirección General de Estadísticas y Censos), 2008, Censo de población 2008 de la Provincia de Córdoba
  11. Fernandes B.M., 2009, Territórios e territorialidades: teorias, processos e conflitos
  12. Ghida‐Daza C., 2009, Zonas agroeconómicas homogéneas Córdoba
  13. Giarracca N., 2010, Disputas por los territorios y recursos naturales: el modelo extractive, Revista Alasru (Nueva Epoca), 5, 113
  14. Goldfarb L. 2012. ‘The Frontiers of Genetically Modified Soya in Argentina. Possession Rights and New Forms of Land Control and Land Governance’. InInternational Conference on Global Land Grabbing II Ithaca NY.
  15. Gras C., 2003, VI Congreso Nacional de Estudios del Trabajo
  16. Gudynas E., 2009, Extractivismo política y sociedad, 187
  17. Haesbaert R., 2004, O mito da desterritorialização: do ‘fim dos territórios’ à multiterritorialidade
  18. INDEC (Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas y Censos), 1988, Censo nacional agropecuario
  19. INDEC (Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas y Censos), 2002, Censo nacional agropecuario
  20. INDEC (Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas y Censos), 2010, Censo nacional de población, hogares y viviendas
  21. Group Kleffman, 2012, Mercado argentino 2011 de productos fitosanitarios
  22. Manzanal M., 2011, Territorio y poder en la globalización: disputas por la tierra en el nordeste de Misiones, Argentina, Revista Paraguaya de Sociología, 48, 163
  23. Montenegro Gómez J.R., 2008, Campesinato e agronegócio na América Latina: a questão agrária atual'
  24. Murmis M., 2011, Dinámica del mercado de la tierra en América Latina y el Caribe: el caso de Argentina
  25. Oyhantçabal G., 2011, Radiografía del agronegocio sojero: descripción de los principales actores y de los impactos socio‐económicos en Uruguay
  26. Pengue W.A., 2007, Cuando tenga la tierra, Le Monde Diplomatique, 94, 10
  27. Reboratti C., 2006, América Latina: cidade, campo e turismo
  28. REDAF (Red Agroforestal Chaco Argentina), 2010, Conflictos sobre tenencia de tierra y ambientales en la región del Chaco argentino
  29. Romano M. 2011.Nosotros siempre fuimos campo abierto: conflictos territoriales derechos a la tierra y poder judicial en el Norte de Córdoba. PhD thesis Universidad Nacional de Córdoba Córdoba.
  30. Silvetti F., 1998, Una perspectiva sociohistórica de las estrategias de reproducción social de pequeños productores del Noroeste de Córdoba, Debate Agrario, 28, 103
  31. TapellaE. 2012.El conflicto social en torno a la apropiación de servicios ecosistémicos en el oeste de la Provincia de Córdoba: la posición de los actores sociales más vulnerables. PhD thesis Universidad Nacional de Córdoba Córdoba.
  32. Tort M.I., 1983, Los contratistas de maquinaria agrícola: una modalidad de organización económica del trabajo agrícola en la pampa húmeda, CEIL Documento de Trabajo, 11
  33. Van Dam C., 2003, Cambio tecnológico, concentración de la propiedad y desarrollo sostenible: los efectos de la introducción del paquete soja‐siembra directa en el umbral al Chaco, Debate Agrario, 35, 133
  34. Wallerstein I., 1997, PEWS XXI ‘The Global Environment and the World System’

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 286

Related

Metadata

Authors
Cáceres, D. M.
Affiliations
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
Corresponding author
Cáceres, Daniel M.
ORCID
Cáceres, Daniel M.
Venue
Journal of Agrarian Change
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-02-19
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
116-147
ISSN
  • 1471-0358 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0366
DOI
10.1111/joac.12057
OpenAlex
W2105980765
Cited by
284
References
105
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 4
FWCI
66.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Agrarian Change (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • Conicet (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
  • CONICET
  • Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
  • US National Science Foundation (GEO-0452325, GEO-1138881)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Development › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Extractivism and Socioeconomic Issues
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Latin American rural development
Keywords
accumulation by dispossession, agribusiness expansion, agricultural capital, socio-environmental conflicts, social struggles, rural resistance, urban resistance, agricultural policy, 2001 crisis, neoliberalism, neo-extractivism, natural capital, wealth concentration, Argentina

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review