Cited by 79Emotional Intelligence and PerformanceCOVID-19 and Mental HealthOccupational Health and Burnout

Correlation between emotional intelligence and negative emotions of front‐line nurses during the COVID‐19 epidemic: A cross‐sectional study

Sun, Huili, Wang, Shuling, Wang, Wei, Han, Guanghong, Liu, Zhijian, Wu, Qi, Pang, Xiaoli·2021·Journal of Clinical Nursing

Abstract

Aims and objectives The purpose of this study was to understand the emotional intelligence level (EI) and negative emotional status of the front-line nurses in the epidemic situation and to further explore the relationship between them. Background During the COVID-19 epidemic, under the influence of multiple factors, nurses were vulnerable to negative emotions. While previous studies have explored, the role of emotional intelligence in negative emotions, the relationship between the two has not been sufficiently discussed in the context of COVID-19. Design The study carried out a cross-sectional survey. The STROBE was selected as the checklist in this study. Methods 202 nurses from Wuhan makeshift hospital participated in the questionnaire survey. Data collection tools included a general data questionnaire designed by the researchers, Chinese version of EI scale (WLEIS-C) and Chinese version of Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21). Descriptive statistics, single factor analysis and correlation analysis were used to analyse the data. Results The emotional intelligence of the front-line nurses was in the upper middle range. Among the negative emotions, anxiety was the most prominent symptom. Conclusions Managers should pay attention to the negative emotional problems of front-line nurses, improve their EI level and promote mental health and the progress of epidemic prevention. Relevance to clinical practice Improving the level of emotional intelligence can reduce the frequ…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jocn.15548

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sun, H., Wang, S., Wang, W., Han, G., Liu, Z., Wu, Q., & Pang, X.
Affiliations
  • Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
  • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Tianjin China
Corresponding author
Pang, Xiaoli
Venue
Journal of Clinical Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-01-21
Volume
30
Issue
3-4
Pages
385-396
ISSN
  • 0962-1067 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2702
OpenAlex
W3094645683
Cited by
79
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 15
FWCI
14.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotional Intelligence and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
Keywords
emotional intelligence, negative emotions, frontline nurses, COVID-19 epidemic, anxiety, depression, stress, nurse mental health, emotional intelligence training
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Adult, Burnout, Professional, Cross-Sectional Studies, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Surveys and Questionnaires, Emotional Intelligence, Checklist

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review