Cited by 596Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement AnalysisFinancial Literacy and BehaviorFinancial Markets and Investment Strategies

How Does Household Portfolio Diversification Vary with Financial Literacy and Financial Advice?

GAUDECKER, HANS‐MARTIN VON·2015·The Journal of Finance

Abstract

Household investment mistakes are an important concern for researchers and policymakers alike. Portfolio underdiversification ranks among those mistakes that are potentially most costly. However, its roots and empirical importance are poorly understood. I estimate quantitatively meaningful diversification statistics and investigate their relationship with key variables. Nearly all households that score high on financial literacy or rely on professionals or private contacts for advice achieve reasonable investment outcomes. Compared to these groups, households with below‐median financial literacy that trust their own decision‐making capabilities lose an expected 50 bps on average. All group differences stem from the top of the loss distribution.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jofi.12231

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Overconfidence reduces individuals' propensity to demand professional financial advice.

    “Finally, Kramer (2014) and von Gaudecker (2015) compare individuals' test-based financial literacy levels with how financially literate they perceive themselves and suggest a role for overconfidence which reduces individuals' propensity to demand professional financial advice”

    From Financial literacy, financial advice, and financial behavior (2017) · cites this paper as von Gaudecker (2015)

  • U.S. retail investors with higher financial sophistication are more likely to hold well-diversified portfolios.

    “Likewise, Clark et al. (2015) document a positive correlation between financial sophistication and excess stock returns among U.S. individuals, while von Gaudecker (2015) finds that this group of retail investors is more likely to hold welldiversified portfolios.”

    From Financial literacy, financial advice, and financial behavior (2017) · cites this paper as von Gaudecker (2015)

  • Most losses from insufficient diversification are spotted among overconfident investors, who are neither financially literate nor consult with financial advisors.

    “However, most losses from insufficient diversification are spotted among overconfident investors, which neither are financially literate nor consult with financial advisors.”

    From Financial literacy, financial advice, and financial behavior (2017) · cites this paper as von Gaudecker 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
GAUDECKER, H. V.
Affiliations
University of Bonn (DE)
Corresponding author
GAUDECKER, HANS‐MARTIN VON
Venue
The Journal of Finance
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-03-12
Volume
70
Issue
2
Pages
489-507
ISSN
  • 0022-1082 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-6261
OpenAlex
W2115540370
Cited by
596
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 52 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
117.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Finance (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy and Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Keywords
financial literacy, financial advice, investment returns

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review