Cited by 802Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement AnalysisIncome, Poverty, and InequalityEconomic theories and models

Optimal Financial Knowledge and Wealth Inequality

Open access
Lusardi, Annamaria, Michaud, Pierre-Carl, Mitchell, Olivia S.·2017·Journal of Political Economy

Abstract

We show that financial knowledge is a key determinant of wealth inequality in a stochastic lifecycle model with endogenous financial knowledge accumulation, where financial knowledge enables individuals to better allocate lifetime resources in a world of uncertainty and imperfect insurance. Moreover, because of how the U.S. social insurance system works, better-educated individuals have most to gain from investing in financial knowledge. Our parsimonious specification generates substantial wealth inequality relative to a one-asset saving model and one where returns on wealth depend on portfolio composition alone. We estimate that 30-40 percent of retirement wealth inequality is accounted for by financial knowledge.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/690950

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • According to a simulation by Lusardi, Michaud, and Mitchell (2017), in a life-cycle model of saving with many sources of uncertainty, from 30 to 40% of US retirement wealth inequality can be accounted for by differences in financial knowledge.

    “according to the simulation by Lusardi, Michaud, and Mitchell (2017), in the context of a life-cycle model of saving with many sources of uncertainty, from 30 to 40% of US retirement wealth inequality can be accounted for by differences in financial knowledge.”

    From Financial literacy and the need for financial education: evidence and implications (2019) · cites this paper as Lusardi, Michaud, and Mitchell (2017)

  • Programs devoted to teaching risk via visual tools have shown great promise.

    “Programs devoted to teaching risk via, for example, visual tools have shown great promise (Lusardi et al., 2017).”

    From Financial literacy and the need for financial education: evidence and implications (2019) · cites this paper as Lusardi et al., 2017

    The Discussion and Conclusions section considers financial education programs in general but does not describe programs that teach risk through visual tools or report that they have shown promise. Searches for visual tools, teaching risk, and program effectiveness found no passage addressing that specific claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Becker Gary S 1975 Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis 2nd New York Columbia University Press
  2. Browning Martin Hansen Lars Heckman James 1999 Micro Data and General Equilibrium Models Handbook of Macroeconomics Taylor John B Woodford Michael Amsterdam Elsevier Science B.V. 543 633
  3. Clark Robert Lusardi Annamaria Mitchell Olivia S 2014 Financial Knowledge and Pension Investment Performance Working Paper no 20137 5 NBER Cambridge, MA
  4. Lusardi Annamaria Michaud Pierre-Carl Mitchell Olivia S 2013 Optimal Financial Knowledge and Wealth Inequality Working Paper no 18669 1 NBER Cambridge, MA PMC5445941 28555088
  5. Lusardi Annamaria Mitchell Olivia S 2011a Financial Literacy and Planning: Implications for Retirement Wellbeing Financial Literacy: Implications for Retirement Security and the Financial Marketplace Mitchell Olivia S Lusardi Annamaria Oxford Oxford University Press 17 39

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lusardi, A., Michaud, P.-C., & Mitchell, O. S.
Affiliations
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
  • HEC Montréal (CA)
Venue
Journal of Political Economy
Published
2017-04
Volume
125
Issue
2
Pages
431-477
ISSN
  • 0022-3808 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-534X
OpenAlex
W3124526872
Cited by
690
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 70 · 2025: 107 · 2024: 90 · 2023: 80 · 2022: 91 · 2021: 76 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
145.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Political Economy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (U01AG009740)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD069609)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic theories and models
Keywords
financial knowledge, wealth inequality, pension wealth, social insurance, portfolio optimization, portfolio composition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review