The DOI matches its Crossref record; 176 of the 176 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cohabitation and Marriage: Complexity and Diversity in Union‐Formation Patterns
Abstract
Nonmarital cohabitation and marriage are now fundamentally linked, a fact that is routinely reflected in current research on union formation. Unprecedented changes in the timing, duration, and sequencing of intimate co‐residential relationships have made the study of traditional marriage far more complex today than in the past. It is now clear that a white, middle‐class, American‐centric research template has become increasingly anachronistic. In this review article, we begin by providing an overview of contemporary theory, empirical approaches, and demographic trends in cohabitation and marriage, focusing primarily on the United States, but also distinguishing the U.S. from patterns found in other high‐income societies, including European countries, Canada, Australia, and in East Asia. We place the spotlight on the causes and consequences of union transitions. We identify the commonalities between cohabitation and marriage, but also key differences that are expressed unevenly across different populations and cultural groups. The rise in nonmarital cohabitation has upended conventional theoretical models and measurement approaches to the study of traditional marriage, complicating matters but also reinvigorating family scholarship on union formation and its implications for partners, children, and society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism
Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2019) · doi:10.1017/9781108595841 · Cited by 2,986
The Unfolding Story of the Second Demographic Transition
Lesthaeghe, R. (2010) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00328.x · Cited by 1,794
Oppenheimer, V. K. (1988) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/229030 · Cited by 1,353
The Gender Revolution: A Framework for Understanding Changing Family and Demographic Behavior
Goldscheider, F., Bernhardt, E., & Lappegård, T. (2015) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2015.00045.x · Cited by 1,209
Marriage and Family in East Asia: Continuity and Change
Raymo, J. M., Park, H., Xie, Y., & Yeung, W.-J. J. (2015) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112428 · Cited by 775
Women's Employment and the Gain to Marriage: The Specialization and Trading Model
Oppenheimer, V. K. (1997) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.23.1.431 · Cited by 766
Re‐theorizing Family Demographics
Esping‐Andersen, G., & Billari, F. C. (2015) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2015.00024.x · Cited by 763
Social relationships and physiological determinants of longevity across the human life span
Yang, Y. C., Boen, C., Gerken, K., Li, T., Schorpp, K., & Harris, K. M. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1511085112 · Cited by 751
Trends and Variation in Assortative Mating: Causes and Consequences
Schwartz, C. R. (2013) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145544 · Cited by 688
World Revolution and Family Patterns
Michel, A., & Goode, W. J. (1964) · Revue Française de Sociologie · doi:10.2307/3319615 · Cited by 643
Cited by
Javadivala, Z., Allahverdipour, H., Asghari Jafarabadi, M., Azimi, S., Gilani, N., & Chattu, V. K. (2021) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-021-01719-0 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Sassler, S., & Lichter, D. T.
- Venue
- Journal of Marriage and Family
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-01-05
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 35-61
- ISSN
- 0022-2445 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3737
- OpenAlex
- W3000422909
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 176
- FWCI
- 68.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cohabitation and Marriage: Complexity and Diversity in Union‐Formation Patterns. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/jomf.12617
- The paper
- Sassler, S., & Lichter, D. T. (2020). Cohabitation and Marriage: Complexity and Diversity in Union‐Formation Patterns. Journal of Marriage and Family. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12617
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.