The DOI matches its Crossref record; 113 of the 113 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Boundary Spanning in Global Organizations
Abstract
Global organizations are inherently complex. The spatial dispersion of activities results in organizational subunits becoming embedded in local host‐country contexts that differ from their parents’ home country contexts. These subunits are also embedded in their parents’ corporate networks, causing them to differ from their locally embedded peers. The dual embeddedness and associated complexities create complex and often implicit boundaries. In addition, the contextual and operational diversity that affects the boundaries in global organizations are continually changing. Hence managing and coordinating across different inter‐ and intra‐organizational boundaries has emerged as an important capability for the success of global organizations. So far, we have a limited understanding of the factors that affect the complexity and effectiveness of the boundary spanning function. In this article, we focus on clarifying these key issues and propose a model for effective boundary spanning in global organizations.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Firms can adjust their inter-unit connectivity through having a strong collaboration network that assists interunit transfers”
From Innovation in and from emerging economies: New insights and lessons for international business research (2021) · cites this paper as Schotter et al., 2017
Citations
Cites
Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/226550 · Cited by 28,308
Coase, R. H. (1937) · Economica · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x · Cited by 23,972
Gioia, D. A., Mehra, A., & Weick, K. E. (1996) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259169 · Cited by 15,616
Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations
Williamson, O. E. (1979) · The Journal of Law and Economics · doi:10.1086/466942 · Cited by 10,190
Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures
Huber, G. P. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.88 · Cited by 8,072
Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. (2009) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/jibs.2009.24 · Cited by 4,751
The Eclectic Paradigm of International Production: A Restatement and Some Possible Extensions
Dunning, J. (1988) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490372 · Cited by 4,660
The Future of the Multinational Enterprise
Buckley, P. J., & Casson, M. (1976) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02899-3 · Cited by 4,478
A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development
Carlile, P. R. (2002) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.13.4.442.2953 · Cited by 3,625
Organizational Legitimacy Under Conditions of Complexity: The Case of the Multinational Enterprise
Kostova, T., & Zaheer, S. (1999) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1999.1580441 · Cited by 3,343
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Dunning J. H., 1993, Multinational Enterprise and the Global Economy
- 10.2307/259084 · DOI
- 10.2307/30040714 · DOI
- 10.2307/259037 · DOI
- Midler C., 2016, Inside the Renault Kwid project: how fractal engineering and frugal engineering can unlock emerging markets
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199707)18:1 <187::AID-SMJ936>3.0.CO;2-K · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Platforms without borders? The international strategies of digital platform firms
Stallkamp, M., & Schotter, A. P. J. (2021) · Global Strategy Journal · doi:10.1002/gsj.1336 · Cited by 420
Self-citationDigitalization and globalization in a turbulent world: Centrifugal and centripetal forces
Autio, E., Mudambi, R., & Yoo, Y. (2021) · Global Strategy Journal · doi:10.1002/gsj.1396 · Cited by 368
Self-citationManaging the MNE subsidiary: Advancing a multi-level and dynamic research agenda
Meyer, K. E., Li, C., & Schotter, A. P. J. (2020) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/s41267-020-00318-w · Cited by 388
Self-citationAnand, J., McDermott, G., Mudambi, R., & Narula, R. (2021) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/s41267-021-00426-1 · Cited by 251
Self-citationThe nature of innovation in global value chains
Ambos, B., Brandl, K., Perri, A., Scalera, V. G., & Assche, A. V. (2021) · Journal of World Business · doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2021.101221 · Cited by 202
Metadata
- Authors
- Schotter, A. P. J., Mudambi, R., Doz, Y. L., & Gaur, A.
- Affiliations
- Western University (CA)
- Temple University (US)
- INSEAD (FR)
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Corresponding author
- Schotter, Andreas P. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Studies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-01-16
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 403-421
- ISSN
- 0022-2380 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6486
- OpenAlex
- W2574331141
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 113
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 10
- FWCI
- 63.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Management Studies (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › International Business and FDI
- Social Sciences › Communication › International Student and Expatriate Challenges
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Keywords
- boundary spanning, international organizations, dual embeddedness, host country context, corporate networks, spatial dispersion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review