Cited by 9Healthcare Education and Workforce IssuesNursing education and managementHealth Education and Validation

Developing and validating the transition status scale for newly graduated nurses in China.

Ma, Weiguang, He, Yuqing, Zhao, Weike, Xu, Ruiyang, Liang, Tao·2021·Journal of Nursing Management

Abstract

AIM: The present study aimed to develop and examine the psychometric properties of the Transition Status Scale for Newly Graduated Nurses. METHODS: Three phases were conducted: Phase I involved a qualitative research to explore and establish the potential items pool; Phase II reduced the items using the item analysis with a sample of 73 nurses. Phase III evaluated the psychometric properties of the final scale. Data from 814 valid questionnaires were analysed using exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. RESULTS: Five factors, including 'Interpersonal integration', 'Profession-related positive emotion', 'Competence for nursing work', and 'Active coping strategies', 'Balance between work and life', accounted for 68.87% of total variance. Cronbach's α was 0.891. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated acceptable model fitness. CONCLUSIONS: The Transition Status Scale for Newly Graduated Nurses has good psychometric properties. It can be used to measure the transition status conveniently and effectively. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: The assessment result with the Transition Status Scale for Newly Graduated Nurses can provide information about the transition status of new nurses, thereby providing reference to guide the specific nursing interventions to smooth the transition process. It can also work as an alternative instrument to compare the effectiveness of different transition programs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jonm.13278

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ma, W., He, Y., Zhao, W., Xu, R., & Liang, T.
Affiliations
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN)
Corresponding author
Ma, Weiguang
Venue
Journal of Nursing Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-02-27
Volume
29
Issue
6
Pages
1819-1829
ISSN
  • 0966-0429 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2834
OpenAlex
W3125410280
Cited by
9
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Nursing Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (71704189)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
Keywords
new nurses, transition to practice, scale development, psychometric validation, work-life balance, coping strategies, professional competence, positive emotions, transition programs
MeSH terms
China, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Nurses, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review