Cited by 29Workplace Health and Well-beingNursing education and managementOccupational Health and Burnout

Personality, staff attitudes and their association with absenteeism and presenteeism in Australian public sector hospital‐based nurses: A cross‐sectional study

Open access
Banks, Colin, Pearson, Sue·2021·Journal of Nursing Management

Abstract

AIM: To examine how personality and attitudes to sick leave influence nurses self-reported rates of absenteeism and presenteeism. BACKGROUND: Despite the significant economic cost and negative impact of absenteeism and presenteeism in health care, there has been limited research looking at personality (using the five-factor model) and absenteeism and presenteeism in nurses. METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey of 320 nurses. RESULTS: Low emotional stability was significantly associated with higher presenteeism. Shift work predicted more absenteeism, whereas those who believed that a culture of entitlement to sick leave existed in the health service were less likely to be absent from work. Increased work-related stress was also a significant predictor of presenteeism. CONCLUSION: The results of this study highlight the role of personality, stress and attitudes in nurses' decision to be absent or present at work when they are sick. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Nurses are the largest workforce in health care settings. Reducing absenteeism and presenteeism in nursing through a greater understanding of the influencing factors will limit the economic impacts of this behaviour and improve patient safety.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jonm.13443

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Banks, C., & Pearson, S.
Affiliations
  • Royal Hobart Hospital (AU)
  • University of Tasmania (AU)
Corresponding author
Banks, Colin
Venue
Journal of Nursing Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-08-23
Volume
29
Issue
8
Pages
2639-2646
ISSN
  • 0966-0429 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2834
OpenAlex
W3190233009
Cited by
29
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3
FWCI
3.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Nursing Management (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UTAS Research Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
University of Tasmania
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
Keywords
absenteeism, presenteeism, nurse personality, Big Five personality traits, emotional stability, shift work, occupational stress, patient safety
MeSH terms
Absenteeism, Presenteeism, Attitude of Health Personnel, Australia, Cross-Sectional Studies, Hospitals, Humans, Nurses, Personality, Public Sector, Sick Leave

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review