Cited by 106Workaholism, burnout, and well-beingSleep and Work-Related FatigueJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior

The recovery potential of intrinsically versus extrinsically motivated off‐job activities

ten Brummelhuis, Lieke L., Trougakos, John P.·2014·Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology

Abstract

Thus far, studies on employee recovery have produced mixed findings about which off‐job activities contribute or impede recovery. We suggest that the recovery potential of an off‐job activity depends on the employee's motivation for the activity. Based on S elf‐ D etermination theory, we expect that leisure activities (social, low‐effort, physical activities), particularly lead to next morning recovery when one has intrinsic, as opposed to extrinsic, motivational tendencies for the activity. Likewise, the harmful effects of high‐duty off‐job activities (work‐related tasks, household chores, care tasks) are expected to be less severe when one is intrinsically, and not extrinsically, motivated for the tasks. During five consecutive days, 74 employees (356 data points) recorded the hours spent on six off‐job activities before going to sleep, and their feelings of exhaustion and recovery the next morning, while overall motivation for each of the six activities was measured by a general questionnaire. As predicted, the positive relationship between leisure activities and next morning recovery was more pronounced among employees with greater inherent intrinsic, in comparison with extrinsic motivation for the activity. Moreover, intrinsic motivation attenuated the positive relationship between high‐duty tasks and next morning exhaustion. Our findings highlight the importance of intrinsic motivation for the recovery potential of off‐job activities. Practitioner points: Engaging in leisure activities after work contributes most to recovery when the employee is intrinsically motivated for those activities. Work‐related off‐job activities are less harmful for recovery when the employee has a general intrinsic, as opposed to an extrinsic, motivation for work‐related activities. Organizations may facilitate employee well‐being by discouraging employees to work beyond regular work hours during leisure time. Organizations may facilitate employee well‐being by creating a work climate in which intrinsic work motives are encouraged.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/joop.12050

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Leisure and other nonwork activities, including physical exercise, recovery experiences, and mastery experiences, can raise a person's energy level, and this carries over to work.

    “Empirical studies have shown that leisure and other nonwork activities, such as physical exercise, recovery experiences, and mastery experiences can elevate an individual's energy level (ten Brummelhuis and Bakker, 2012; ten Brummelhuis and Trougakos, 2014; see Sonnentag et al., 2017 for a review)”

    From Work hard or play hard: the effect of leisure crafting on opportunity recognition and venture performance (2023) · cites this paper as ten Brummelhuis and Trougakos, 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
ten Brummelhuis, L. L., & Trougakos, J. P.
Affiliations
  • Beedie School of Business Simon Fraser University Burnaby British Columbia Canada
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Venue
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-12-12
Volume
87
Issue
1
Pages
177-199
ISSN
  • 0963-1798 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8325
OpenAlex
W2042739860
Cited by
106
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2
FWCI
3.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Workaholism, burnout, and well-being
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Keywords
employee recovery, intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, self-determination theory, leisure, exhaustion, employee well-being, work-life boundaries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review