The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gender differences in temporomandibular disorders in adult populational studies: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Abstract
Summary: The objective of this study was to systematically evaluate gender differences in the prevalence of TMD. A systematic review was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and LILACS in duplicate by two independent reviewers. The inclusion criteria were cross‐sectional studies that reported the prevalence of TMD for men and women and that used the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) Axis I group diagnostic criteria:(group I = muscle disorders; group II = disc displacements; group III = arthralgias/arthritis/arthrosis).To be eligible for inclusion, studies must include adult individuals (>18 years) from a non‐clinical population (ie without pre‐diagnosis of TMD); in other words, from population‐based studies. There were no restrictions on the year and language of publication. The quality of the articles was assessed by an adapted version of the Newcastle‐Ottawa Scale(NOS), and the publication bias was assessed by a funnel plot graph. Data were quantitatively analysed by meta‐analysis using odds ratio (OR) as the measure effect. The electronic search retrieved a total of 6104 articles, of which 112 articles were selected for full‐text reading according to the eligibility criteria. By means of manual search, one study was retrieved. Five articles were selected for meta‐analysis with a combined sample of 2518 subjects. Women had higher prevalence of TMD in all RDC/TMD diagnostic groups. The meta‐analysis yielded the following results: (a) OR = 2.24 for global TMD (groups I, II and III combined), (b) OR = 2.09 for group I, (c) OR = 1.6 for group II and (d) OR = 2.08 for group III. The importance of gender in the development of TMD has been demonstrated, with a two times greater risk of women to develop it as compared to men.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139
Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis
Higgins, J. P. T., & Thompson, S. G. (2002) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.1186 · Cited by 36,763
von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008 · Cited by 17,893
Schiffman, E., Ohrbach, R., Truelove, E., Look, J., Anderson, G., Goulet, J.-P., List, T., Svensson, P., Gonzalez, Y., Lobbezoo, F., et al. (2014) · Journal of Oral & Facial Pain and Headache · doi:10.11607/jop.1151 · Cited by 4,567
(1992) · PubMed · Cited by 3,804
A systematic review including meta-analysis of work environment and depressive symptoms
Theorell, T., Hammarström, A., Aronsson, G., Träskman Bendz, L., Grape, T., Hogstedt, C., Marteinsdottir, I., Skoog, I., & Hall, C. (2015) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-015-1954-4 · Cited by 982
Racine, M., Tousignant-Laflamme, Y., Kloda, L. A., Dion, D., Dupuis, G., & Choinière, M. (2012) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2011.11.025 · Cited by 691
Psychological factors associated with development of TMD: the OPPERA prospective cohort study
Fillingim, R. B., Ohrbach, R., Greenspan, J. D., Knott, C., Diatchenko, L., Dubner, R., Bair, E., Baraian, C., Mack, N., Slade, G. D., et al. (2013) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2013.06.009 · Cited by 528
Risk Factors for Diagnostic Subgroups of Painful Temporomandibular Disorders (TMD)
Huang, G. J., LeResche, L., Critchlow, C. W., Martin, M. D., & Drangsholt, M. T. (2002) · Journal of Dental Research · doi:10.1177/154405910208100412 · Cited by 395
Giles, B. E., & Walker, J. S. (1999) · Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology · doi:10.1097/00001503-199910000-00017 · Cited by 287
Cited by
Temporomandibular disorders: A review of current concepts in aetiology, diagnosis and management
Kapos, F. P., Exposto, F. G., Oyarzo, J. F., & Durham, J. (2020) · Oral Surgery · doi:10.1111/ors.12473 · Cited by 351
Sex Differences in the Response to Different Tinnitus Treatment
Van der Wal, A., Luyten, T., Cardon, E., Jacquemin, L., Vanderveken, O. M., Topsakal, V., Van de Heyning, P., De Hertogh, W., Van Looveren, N., Van Rompaey, V., et al. (2020) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2020.00422 · Cited by 46
Yap, A. U., & Marpaung, C. (2023) · Oral Diseases · doi:10.1111/odi.14343 · Cited by 15
Staniszewski, K., Willassen, L., Berge, T., Johansson, A., Schjødt, B., & Rosèn, A. (2022) · Journal of Pain Research · doi:10.2147/jpr.s341861 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Bueno, C. H., Pereira, D. D., Pattussi, M. P., Grossi, P. K., & Grossi, M. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-06-15
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 720-729
- ISSN
- 0305-182X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2842
- OpenAlex
- W2807410584
- Cited by
- 451
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 8.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gender differences in temporomandibular disorders in adult populational studies: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/joor.12661
- The paper
- Bueno, C. H., Pereira, D. D., Pattussi, M. P., Grossi, P. K., & Grossi, M. L. (2018). Gender differences in temporomandibular disorders in adult populational studies: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12661
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
