Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 287

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gender differences in pain

Giles, Belinda E., Walker, Judith S.·1999·Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology

Abstract

A literature survey reveals clear evidence of sex differences in the incidence of painful conditions and their severity, both being greater in women. The possible causes of this sexual dimorphism are discussed. Sex-role stereotyping may be relevant and there is evidence to indicate that, perhaps through their roles as carers, women seek and utilize more medical services than men. Less clear-cut evidence for anatomical and physiological differences is reviewed, together with documentation of hormonal (and reproductive cycle) influences on the operation of those systems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00001503-199910000-00017

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Cited by

See all 287

Metadata

Authors
Giles, B. E., & Walker, J. S.
Venue
Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology
Published
1999-10
Volume
12
Issue
5
Pages
591-595
ISSN
0952-7907 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2315479186
Cited by
287
References
32
FWCI
3.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gender differences in pain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00001503-199910000-00017
The paper
Giles, B. E., & Walker, J. S. (1999). Gender differences in pain. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001503-199910000-00017

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.