Cited by 4Dental Education, Practice, ResearchHealth Sciences Research and EducationHealth Policy Implementation Science

Practice-based research in dentistry: Exploring methodologies, benefits, and challenges

Open access
Mungia, Rahma, Funkhouser, Ellen, Lobbezoo, Frank, Verhoeff, Merel Charlotte, Gilbert, Gregg H., National Dental PBRN Collaborative Group·2025·Journal of Oral Rehabilitation

Abstract

Background: Practice‐Based Research Network (PBRN) studies typically assess the effectiveness of clinical interventions in settings that match real‐world conditions. Dental PBRNs have the capacity to amass, identify, and analyze vast amounts of data from patient populations that include diverse racial, ethnic, socio‐economic, and geographic backgrounds. These dental studies encompass a broad spectrum of healthcare aspects, including prevention, diagnosis, symptom and disease treatment, quality enhancement, and care coordination. Methods: An extensive range of research methodologies can be employed within dental PBRNs to investigate these topics, including randomized controlled trials. Dental PBRNs have evolved from primarily focusing on case observations to leveraging advanced network infrastructure and collaborating across multiple regional and national sites. In addition to producing numerous high‐impact peer‐reviewed publications, study results have led to improved clinical care. However, PBRNs encounter challenges, such as the sustainability of research capacity (relying heavily on ongoing support from funding agencies), diverse research cultures, and an imperative to design studies that are both feasible and relevant to everyday clinical practice. Recognizing the pivotal role of real‐world evidence, it is important to have sustained investment in dental PBRN infrastructure and feasible opportunities for practitioners to participate in network activities nationwide. Conclusion: Practice‐Based Research Network studies capitalize on an important research context within which to investigate a range of clinical topics that can employ multiple research methodologies. However, sustaining productive networks requires strategic effort, ongoing financial support, and customized organizational skills.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/joor.13843

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mungia et al. highlighted the importance of designing studies that are practical and relevant to everyday clinical practice, which increases the likelihood of participation.

    “In addition, Mungia et al. highlighted the importance of designing studies that are practical and relevant to everyday clinical practice, which increases the likelihood of participation [30].”

    From Private Dental Practitioners' Experience in a Dental Practice-Based Research Network: A Qualitative Evaluation (2026) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says designing studies that are feasible and relevant to everyday clinical practice is imperative. It also identifies practitioner recruitment as a challenge, but does not state that such study designs increase the likelihood of participation. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Mungia et al. emphasized the importance of strategic efforts such as sustained investment in infrastructure, effective engagement strategies, and bespoke organizational skills to ensure the productive operation of PBRNs.

    “Additionally, Mungia et al. emphasized the importance of strategic efforts such as sustained investment in infrastructure, effective engagement strategies, and bespoke organizational skills to ensure the productive operation of PBRNs [30].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [8]Oral Health in America: Advances and Challenges: Executive Summary. National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (US); 2021. 35020293

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mungia, R., Funkhouser, E., Lobbezoo, F., Verhoeff, M. C., Gilbert, G. H., & National Dental PBRN Collaborative Group
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Mungia, Rahma
Venue
Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-08-16
Volume
52
Issue
8
Pages
1175-1184
ISSN
  • 0305-182X (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2842
OpenAlex
W4401668801
Cited by
4
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2
FWCI
0.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Oral Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (U19‐DE‐28717, U19‐DE‐22516, UM1‐TR‐004538)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Dental Education, Practice, Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
practice-based research networks, dental research, real-world evidence, research sustainability, research capacity, randomized controlled trials, clinical research infrastructure, research funding, quality of dental care
MeSH terms
Dental Care, Humans, Research Design, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Dental Research, Evidence-Based Dentistry, Community-Based Participatory Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review