Welcoming the Unwelcome: How Contact Shapes Contexts of Reception for New Immigrants in Germany and the United States
Open accessAbstract
How receiving society members perceive and respond to immigration are crucial factors that shape the context of reception for immigrants coming to a new country. In this paper, we examine these processes through the lens of intergroup contact research, with a focus on relations between immigrants and members of receiving societies, to discern ways in which receiving societies are or are not welcoming toward immigrants. Reviewing recent theorizing with illustrative empirical studies and ongoing programs of research that focus on new immigrants in Germany and the United States, we describe how direct and indirect forms of positive and negative contact can serve either to facilitate or inhibit positive immigrant‐receiving community relations. We also discuss factors that may contribute to the emergence of positive and negative contact experiences between immigrants and receiving society members. We close with a discussion of policy implications.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Negative contact experiences, particularly when associated with feelings of intergroup anxiety and threat, can increase prejudice toward immigrants.
“negative contact experiences, particularly when they are associated with feelings of intergroup anxiety and threat, can increase prejudice toward immigrants.”
From Prejudice and Discrimination Toward Immigrants (2021) · cites this paper as Kotzur et al. 2018
The research to date on the effects of positive contact with immigrants holds considerable promise.
“The research to date on the effects of positive contact with immigrants holds considerable promise (Kotzur et al. 2018; see also Ramos et al. 2019), and additional research on this strategy and others is needed.”
From Prejudice and Discrimination Toward Immigrants (2021) · cites this paper as Kotzur et al. 2018
Cites
A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory.
Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006) · Journal of personality and social psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751 · Cited by 8,964 · see citing works
Self-citationPettigrew, T. F. (1998) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.65 · Cited by 6,001 · see citing works
In search of the powerful self-fulfilling prophecy
Madon, S., Jussim, L., & Eccles, J. (1997) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.4.791 · Cited by 304 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Prejudice and Discrimination Toward Immigrants
Esses, V. M. (2021) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-080520-102803 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kotzur, P. F., Tropp, L. R., & Wagner, U.
- Affiliations
- Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
- University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kotzur, Patrick F.
- Venue
- Journal of Social Issues
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-11-14
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 812-832
- ISSN
- 0022-4537 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-4560
- OpenAlex
- W2901246132
- Cited by
- 68
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6
- FWCI
- 15.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- Journal of Social Issues (publishedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
- Keywords
- intergroup contact, immigrant reception, new immigrants, immigration policy, Germany, United States
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review